Table 2 Risk of bias assessment of the 10 included studies
Study | Criteria and Corresponding Scoresa | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | % | Risk of Bias | |
Adegoke et al. [13] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | Low |
Alnaser and Aljadi [14] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 78% | Low |
Buddhadev and Kotecha [16] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 67% | Moderate |
Campo et al. [17] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 89% | Low |
Campo et al. [18] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | Low |
Chung et al. [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 89% | Low |
Cromie et al. [5] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | Low |
Glover et al. [20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | Low |
McMahon et al. [21] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 89% | Low |
Rossettini et al. [22] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 89% | Low |
Rozenfeld et al. [23] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | Low |
West and Gardner [24] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 89% | Low |