Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias assessment of the 10 included studies

From: Prevalence of and prevention for work-related upper limb disorders among physical therapists: a systematic review

Study Criteria and Corresponding Scoresa  
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 % Risk of Bias
Adegoke et al. [13] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% Low
Alnaser and Aljadi [14] 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 78% Low
Buddhadev and Kotecha [16] 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 67% Moderate
Campo et al. [17] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 89% Low
Campo et al. [18] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% Low
Chung et al. [19] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 89% Low
Cromie et al. [5] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% Low
Glover et al. [20] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% Low
McMahon et al. [21] 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 89% Low
Rossettini et al. [22] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 89% Low
Rozenfeld et al. [23] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100% Low
West and Gardner [24] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 89% Low
  1. aQ1-Q9 indicate questions 1 to 9 based on the JBI criteria located in Appendix
  2. Score of 1: indicates the article does fulfill the specified criteria
  3. Score of 0: indicates the article does not fulfill the stated criteria
  4. Studies with >70% = low risk of bias, studies with 50-69% = moderate risk of bias, and studies with <50% = high risk of bias