Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the patients enrolled in the study

From: Bioresorbable implants vs. Kirschner-wires in the treatment of severely displaced distal paediatric radius and forearm fractures – a retrospective multicentre study

Characteristics

K-wire group I. (n = 40)

Bioresorbable group (n = 30)

K-wire group II. (n = 24)

Comments

Average age, years (mean ± standard deviation)

8.125 ± 2.334

8.067 ± 2.586

8.963 ± 2.638

No difference (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.286; ε2 = 0.026)

Sex ratio (Number of patients) (male: female)

3 (30:10)

1.7273 (19:11)

2.4286 (17:7)

No difference (Chi squared test, p = 0.571)

Injured upper limb side (No, %)

 Right

18 (45)

16 (53.3333)

N/D

No difference (Chi squared test, p = 0.49)

 Left

22 (55)

14 (46.6667)

N/D

Type of fracture (No)

 Isolated radius fractures) (AO 23r-M/3.1) (number of patients

13

6

7

No difference (Chi squared test, p = 0.503)

 Complete forearm fractures (AO 23-M/3.1) (number of patients)

27

24

17

Follow-up history (mean ± standard deviation)

 Return hospital visits

in the first six weeks

4.05 ± 1.3

3.067 ± 0.254

6.074 ± 1.269

Significant difference (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; ε2 = 0.579)