Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
20 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven C Herath |
11 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabian Stuby |
6 Dec 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - William E. C. Poole |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Jan 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - William E. C. Poole |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
19 Jan 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - William E. C. Poole |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
17 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - William E. C. Poole |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
22 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - William E. C. Poole |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
22 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
12 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven C Herath |
16 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabian Stuby |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Publishing | ||
23 Mar 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Apr 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12891-022-05299-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.