Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of parameters among the different scoliosis groups

From: Scoliosis in dysplastic spondylolisthesis: a clinical survey of 50 young patients

 

Independent scoliosis group (n = 8)

Spasm scoliosis group (n = 11)

Olisthetic scoliosis group (n = 9)

F value

P value

Age (year)

13.1 ± 1.8

12.7 ± 2.9

18.9 ± 7.8

4.602

0.020

Slip Percentage (%)

75.6 ± 27.4

65.8 ± 21.5

72.6 ± 21.0

0.449

0.643

Dub-LSA(°)

56.8 ± 19.2

64.5 ± 10.3

62.9 ± 17.6

0.590

0.562

Coronal Cobb angle (°)

24.7 ± 15.2

13.9 ± 3.0

12.9 ± 1.9

5.188

0.013

Curve span

6.4 ± 0.7

8.0 ± 1.5

5.1 ± 0.9

13.106

 < 0.001

C7PL-CSVL (mm)

23.3 ± 24.7

16.6 ± 15.1

18.9 ± 9.4

0.357

0.703

PI (°)

67.1 ± 14.4

72.3 ± 13.1

69.4 ± 10.4

0.392

0.680

PT (°)

39.8 ± 8.1

38.6 ± 13.3

36.5 ± 8.8

0.213

0.810

Sacral slope (°)

27.4 ± 19.0

33.7 ± 16.5

33.0 ± 9.1

0.437

0.651

LL (°)

46.4 ± 21.4

48.3 ± 25.1

58.9 ± 16.2

0.849

0.428

SVA (mm)

65.4 ± 32.2

58.2 ± 44.3

31.6 ± 19.0

2.163

0.138

VAS (low back pain or lower limb pain)

5.0 ± 2.7

4.5 ± 1.9

3.8 ± 1.6

0.759

0.479

ODI (%)

36.1 ± 14.7

31.9 ± 20.5

21.7 ± 11.3

1.761

0.193

JOA-29 score

17.0 ± 4.8

16.5 ± 5.9

19.7 ± 4.7

0.963

0.395

  1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Dub-LSA Dubousset’s lumbosacral angle, C7PL-CSVL c7 plumb line to central sacral vertical line, PI pelvic incidence, PT pelvic tilt, LL lumbar lordosis, SVA sagittal vertical axis, VAS visual analogue score, ODI Oswestry disability index, JOA Japanese orthopaedic association