Skip to main content

Table 8 Outcome Summary for Acceleration variables

From: Head kinematics in patients with neck pain compared to asymptomatic controls: a systematic review

Mean Acceleration

Summary of findings for INP:

• Decreased mean acceleration in INP patients compared to healthy controls

• Level of evidence: limited

Publication

Sample

Task

Task specifications

Results compared to C

Risk of Bias

Tsang et al. [78]

INP 34

C 34

Unconstrained

Speed: Self-preferred

Directions: FLEX/EXT, ROT, LFLEX

Decreased in INP

moderate

Peak Acceleration

Summary of findings for INP:

• Inconsistent findings on peak acceleration in INP patients compared to healthy controls

• Level of evidence: conflicting

Summary of findings for WAD:

• Decreased peak acceleration in WAD patients compared to healthy controls

• Level of evidence: moderate

Publication

Sample

Task

Task specifications

Results compared to C

Risk of Bias

Baydal-Bertomeu et al. [57]

WAD 30

C 29

Unconstrained

Speed: Self-preferred

Direction: FLEX/EXT

Decreased in WAD

moderate

Tsang et al. [79]

INP 30

C 30

Functional

Speed: Self- preferred

Task: Predictable

Function: Lifting a 2 kg weight by one hand from a desk to a shelf

Decreased in INP

moderate

Vikne et al. [80]

WAD 15

C 15

Unconstrained

Speed: Slow(S), preferred (P), max (MAX)

Directions: FLEX/EXT

Decreased in WAD for FBN in S Decreased in WAD for EFN and FBN in P Decreased in WAD for all directions in MAX

moderate

Hage et al. [63]

INP 9

C 15

Head aiming; Pointing

Speed: as fast as possible

Targets: predictable

Directions: ROT

No significant differences

high

Peak Deceleration

Summary of findings for INP:

• No difference on peak deceleration in INP patients compared to healthy controls

• Level of evidence: very limited

Summary of findings for WAD:

• Decreased peak deceleration in WAD patients compared to healthy controls in maximal speed condition

• Level of evidence: limited

Vikne et al. [80]

WAD 15

C 15

Unconstrained

Speed: Slow(S), preferred (P), max (MAX)

Directions: FLEX/EXT

Decreased in WAD for EFN in S Decreased in WAD for EFN and FBN in P Decreased in WAD for all directions in MAX

moderate

Hage et al. [63]

INP 9

C 15

Head aiming; Pointing

Speed: as fast as possible

Targets: predictable

Directions: ROT

No significant differences

high

Magnitude of Circumduction Vectors (MCV)

Summary of findings for NP:

• Decreased MCV in NP patients compared to healthy controls

• Level of evidence: very limited

Publication

Sample

Task

Task specifications

Results compared to C

Risk of Bias

Zhou et al. [83]

NP 28

C 23

Unconstrained

Speed: Self-preferred

Direction: Circumduction

Decreased in NP

high

  1. C controls, EFN Extension from neutral position, EXT Extension, F fast, FBN Flexion back to neutral position, FLEX Flexion, INP idiopathic neck pain, LFLEX Lateralflexion, MAX maximal, MCV Magnitude of circumduction vector, NP unclassified neck pain, P preferred, ROT Rotation, S slow, WAD whiplash associated disorder