Author (year), Country | Demographics n (% Female) Mean(SD) age (years) | Study inclusions/exclusions of musculoskeletal (MSK) pain group | Pain sensitization assessment | Aerobic exercise protocol (including type and dosage) | Results | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental, repeated measures studies | ||||||
Hoffman (2005), USA | Chronic LBP subjects n: 8 (50%) Age: 40(10) Healthy subjects n: 10 (70%) Age: 34(8) | Inclusions -LBP≥1 year -Clinical pain: stable and non-neurological Exclusions -Use of narcotics -Inability to walk without a device -Sacroiliac joint dysfunction -Involvement in a regular exercise or treatment program -Major surgery in the past year -History of spondyloarthropathy -Spinal infection, fracture, spondylolisthesis or malignancy -Cardiac, pulmonary or metabolic disorders, or diseases involving sensory nerves -Conditions preventing safe participation in exercise -Pregnancy | Device: Pressure pain stimulator with Lucite edge (6mmx0.25mm) Force: 9.8 N Locations: dorsal surface of the middle phalanx of the non-dominant index finger Duration: 2 min Scale: 100mm VAS | -1st PPT 1 min before starting aerobic exercise -Cycling on ergometer for 5 min at 50% VO2max followed by 20 min at 70% VO2max -2nd PPT 2 min after completion of cycling -3rd PPT 28 min after completion of the 2nd PPT (32 min post exercise) | Mean (SD) pressure pain ratings were significantly lower at 2 min (57(26) mm) and 32 min post exercise (62(27) mm) compared to pre-exercise values (79(12) mm) (p<0.05). | Exercise-induced analgesia to an experimentally induced pressure pain was evident for >30 min after aerobic exercise from cycling in people with chronic low back pain and minimal/ moderate disability. |
Meeus (2010), Belgium | Chronic LBP n=21 (48%) Age: 41.6(12.4) Chronic fatigue syndrome with chronic pain n=26 (19%) Age: 41.5(11.4) Healthy subjects n=31 (32%) Age: 40.0 (12.6) | Inclusions -18-65 years - Non-specific LBP≥3 months - Sedentary Exclusions -Pregnancy and ≤1 year postnatal -Neurological or cardiovascular problems - Specific LBP pathology -History of spinal fracture, spinal surgery, severe degenerative change, severe scoliosis, osteoporosis, obesity, radicular signs, malignancies and metabolic or rheumatological diseases | Device: Fisher algometer Force: Increased at a range of 1 kg/s Locations: skin web between thumb and index finger, 5 cm lateral to L3 spinous process, insertion of deltoid and at the proximal third of the calf Measures: Mean of last 2 of 3 consecutive measurements at each site separated by 10 s before and after each exercise bout. | 6 bouts of exercise on a bicycle ergometer -Incremental, starting at 20 W and increasing in steps of 10 W/minute -Each bout began with a warm-up period, starting from 0 and increasing by 1 W every 2 s -Exercise consisted of 2 incremental 1-minute steps -Each bout finished with a cool down of 30 s -Subjects instructed to stop when tired or couldn’t pedal at frequency of ≥70 rpm -6th exercise bout ended at 130 W | Baseline There were no significant differences in PPTs between healthy subjects and patients with chronic LBP (p=NA). Post-exercise The mean(SD) PPTs increased following exercise in healthy and CLBP individuals: Healthy: 7.11(2.74) to 7.56(3.17) (p=0.001). CLBP: 8.10(3.02) to 8.28(3.49) (p=0.001). | After submaximal aerobic exercise, mean pain thresholds increased in patients with chronic LBP. There was no evidence of hyperalgesia and abnormal central pain processing during submaximal aerobic exercise in individuals with chronic LBP. |
Vaegter (2016), Denmark | Chronic musculoskeletal pain n: 61(69%) Age: 45.4(11.2) Low (LPS; N=30) and high (HPS; N=31) pain-sensitivity groups were created on the basis of a median split of the average PPTs. | Inclusions -Chronic musculoskeletal pain (37 low back, 16 neck, 7 shoulder, 1 elbow) -Referral to multidisciplinary pain clinic Exclusions -Neurological, psychiatric or CVD conditions | Device: Manual handheld algometer Force: Increment rate of 30 kPa/s over stimulation area 1cm2 Locations: Middle of both quadriceps femoris, dominant biceps brachii and non-dominant upper trapezius muscle Measures: Before, after, and 15 min after the exercise | Aerobic stationary cycling -Age-related target HR corresponding to 50% VO2max and 75% VO2max -Patients pedaled at ~70 revolutions per minute -First 2 min: warm up (HR: 50% VO2max) -Resistance increased over next 3 min until HR: 75% VO2max -Continuation to maintain this HR for 10 min | Baseline PPT and pain tolerance were decreased in the HPS group compared to the LPS (P=0.001; 0.02 respectively). Post-exercise Widespread PPTs increased after exercise in both groups HPS: 272.8(158.0) to 319.1 (162.1) (p<0.05) LPS: 574.7(362.1) to 646.3(378.8) (p<0.05) Cuff PPT increased and pain tolerance limit decreased after exercises in LPS only (p<0.001). Temporal summation of pain was increased after bicycling in HPS (p<0.005). Pain tolerance increased after exercise in both groups (p<0.001). | Hypoalgesia after the exercise was impaired in patients with chronic pain and high pain sensitivity compared with patients with less pain sensitivity. |
Vaegter (2018), Denmark | Chronic musculoskeletal pain n: 54(72%) Age: 45.7(11.2) Participants were subgrouped into high and low kinesiophobia based on the recommended threshold for a high degree of kinesiophobia on the Tampa scale. | All patients recruited after referral to a multidisciplinary pain clinic | Device: Manual handheld algometer Force: Increment rate of 30 kPa/s over stimulation area 1cm2 Locations: Middle of both quadriceps femoris, dominant biceps brachii and non-dominant upper trapezius muscle Measures: Before, after, and 15 min after the exercise, 2 assessments per site, average used for analysis | 2 exercise conditions on 2 different days -Cycling -Isometric contraction Aerobic stationary cycling -Age-related target HR corresponding to 50% VO2max and 75% VO2max were determined -Patients pedaled at ~70 revolutions per minute -First 2 min: warm up (HR: 50% VO2max) -Resistance increased over next 3 min until HR: 75% VO2max -Continuation to maintain this HR for 10 min | Baseline The low kinesiophobia group had higher PPTs than the high kinesiophobia group, however no significant differences were found between the groups (p=0.09-0.59). Post-exercise No significant differences were found in percentage increase in PPTs between the high and low kinesiophobia groups post-exercise (p=0.12-0.58). | Although kinesiophobic beliefs influence pain intensity, they did not influence PPTs and EIH significantly, suggesting that exercise can induce hypoalgesia in subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain, regardless of such belief. |
Fingleton (2017), Ireland | OA group n:40 Divided into: -Abnormal CPM (decrease or absence of change in PPTs) (n=19) -Normal CPM (increase in PPTs) (n=21) Control group n:20 aged and sex matched subjects | Inclusions -Knee OA based on ACR criteria and pain >3/10 on a numerical rating scale -Main pain from knee OA Exclusions -Total knee replacement and if <90 degrees knee flexion -Rheumatologic disease such as RA, fibromyalgia or ankylosing spondylitis - Neurologic disorder such as Parkinsons disease, shingles, multiple sclerosis or stroke - Cognitive impairment - Current use of antidepressants or anticonvulsants | Device: Handheld pressure algometer Force: 2cm2 probe, pressure applied at a rate of 30KPa/s Locations: Medial joint line, quadriceps femoris muscle and volar surface of the forearm Measures: Average of 2 PPT measurements was recorded for each site | Aerobic exercise protocol -Cycle ergometer -Submaximal exercise protocol used: Aerobic Power Index test -Exercise duration varied between 4 and 10 min -Pain was monitored on a numerical rating scale after each minute -If pain at the knee joint exceeded 3/10, the participant’s workload was reduced by 25 W by decreasing rate of pedaling and/or resistance | There were significant differences between abnormal CPM, normal CPM and control groups for changes in PPTs during and post-aerobic exercise (F2,55=4.860, p=0.01) The abnormal CPM group showed a decrease in PPTs (168.9(43.1) to 152.8(52.3)), while the normal CPM and control groups showed an increase in PPTs (184.3(58.1) to 205.7(76.1) (P<0.05) and 218.0 (93.2) to 237.5 (111.7) p>0.05 pre and post exercise respectively). | Knee OA patients with abnormal CPM demonstrated significantly increased pain sensitivity in response to exercise, while knee OA patients with normal CPM and controls demonstrated a significant decrease in their pain sensitivity in response to exercise suggestive of normal function of EIH. |
Vaegter (2021), Denmark | n: 96 (37.5%) Age: Mean (range): 47(20-73) | Inclusions - Individuals ≥ 18 years who were adept in Danish -Pain primarily in the lower back (+/- pain radiating to the legs) Exclusions -Pregnancy, neurological, psychological or cardiovascular diseases, and current or previous alcohol or drug addiction | Device: Manual pressure algometry Force: stimulation probe of 1 cm2 was used and the pressure was increased with 30 kPa/s Locations: Left erector spinae and left calf muscles Measures: average PPTs across two repetitions at each site | 6 min walk test on 20 m course between 2 cones | No significant main effects were found for PPTs. However, a significant interaction between time and Walk-Pain Index was found in the RM-ANOVA of the PPTs (F(1,94)=5.56, p=0.02, partial ƞ2 = 0.056). Post hoc testing showed an increase in PPTs after walking in individuals who reported no or little increase in NRS scores of back pain intensity, and a decrease in PPTs after walking in individuals who reported an increase of 2 or more in NRS back pain intensity scores. | This study found most individuals experienced exercise-induced hypoalgesia after walking, with the exception of those that reported an increase in pain during walking and subsequently no hypoalgesia afterwards. |
Sitges (2021), Spain | Aerobic exercise n: 21 (57%) Age: 42.5 (9.72) Control n:19 (58%) Age: 40.71 (9.95) | Inclusions -18–59 years -NSCLBP >6 weeks or with at least 3 episodes of LBP (lasting >1 week) in the year prior to the study Exclusions -High functional impairment compromising such activities as walking, sitting, or getting up from a chair, pain at time of evaluation and/or intervention >5 (out of 10) on the VAS, history or presence of sciatic radiating pain, referred pain, or OA of lower extremities, spine surgery, spinal or pelvic fracture, hospitalization for serious trauma, injuries, or traffic accidents, and systematic diseases affecting the locomotor system. | Device: Digital algometer Force: Maximum 5 kg/cm2, no further details given Locations: Erector spinae and gluteus medius muscles, sacrum and forefinger Measures: no details given. | Aerobic intervention consisted of walking on a treadmill for 20 min at low–moderate intensity (65.9%±7% of maximum heart rate and 3.02±1.04 using the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion) No information provided on the control group. | Mixed-model ANOVA revealed significant main effects of time on subjective PPIRs (F1, 77=13.142, p=0.001, ηp2=0.146). Bonferroni post hoc analyses showed: lower PPIRs (2.581±1.584 vs. 2.865±1.629, p=0.001) and lower PPTs (2.581 ±1.584 vs. 2.0.865±1.629, p=0.001) after intervention than before. Mixed-model ANOVA revealed significant main effects of time on the pressure pain–sensitivity index (F 1, 77=7.074, p<0.001, Greenhouse-Geisser correct: ηp2=0.084). Bonferroni post hoc analyses showed a reduction in pain sensitivity after intervention (1.217±0.945 vs. 1.082±0.918, p=0.010). | This study showed reductions in pain sensitivity after an aerobic exercise intervention in patients with non-specific, chronic low back pain. |
Randomised controlled trial | ||||||
Öte Karaca (2017), Turkey | Aerobic exercise: n: 25 (64%) Age: 43.7(10.8) Control: n: 25 (68%) Age: 44.9(7.9) | Inclusions -MSK pain > 3 months -Recruited from Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Department outpatient clinic Exclusions -Uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmias -Inflammatory arthritis -Fibromyalgia -Taking analgesia -Physical therapy -Regular exercise in the last 6 months | Device: Mechanical pressure algometer Force: 1cm2 diameter pressure surface, 1 kg/s increments Locations: Midpoint of forehead, bilateral volar surface of forearm and thumb nails Measures: 3 consecutive measurements at 30-60 s intervals and mean taken to be pressure threshold | Intervention -Submaximal aerobic exercise program -Treadmill walking -30 min 5 days a week for 2 weeks -70-85% maximum HR -With conventional physical therapy Control -Conventional physical therapy | PPT sum increased significantly in the exercise group from 19.9(6.1) to 22.0(6.3) (p=0.02), but was unchanged in the control group (20.7(5.4) to 20.9(6.7) (p=0.9)). There was a significant increase in exercise duration in the exercise group compared with the control group (p=0.0002). Pain intensity in both groups decreased significantly after exercise (p<0.001). | Short-term aerobic exercise along with conventional physical therapy decreased pain sensitivity in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. |
Nielsen (2009), Denmark | Aerobic exercise: n: 11 (100%) Age: 49(7) Control: n: 5 (100%) Age: 48(11) | Inclusions -Female office workers with monotonous, repetitive tasks -Chronic pain in the neck, doctor-verified tightness of the upper trapezius muscle (UTM) and tenderness on UTM palpation -Specific criteria 1) Pain for > 30 days in past year in neck/shoulder region, but with no more than 3 regions with symptoms 2) At least ‘‘quite a lot’’: on an ordinal scale of ‘‘a little” to ‘‘very much’’ 3) Frequent: at least once a week on an ordinal scale of ‘‘seldom” to “almost all the time’’ 4) Intensity: ≥2 on a scale from 0 to 9 Exclusions -Previous trauma, life-threatening diseases, whiplash injury, cardiovascular diseases, arthritis in the neck and shoulder | Device: Electronic pressure algometer Force: Contact diameter 10mm, increments of 30 kPa/s Locations: Descending part of the trapezius muscle and the middle of the non-painful TA muscle Measures: Before and after intervention, 3 times with at least 1 min between the measurements | Intervention -Leg bicycling on stationary Monark ergometer at 70% maximal oxygen uptake for 20 min 3 x pw for 10 weeks -Initial load 50% based on HR and gradually increased to 70% during the 10 weeks Control -No physical training, general health advice | Case-control study: Baseline PPTs were significantly lower in neck/shoulder pain group than the control group: Trapezius Neck pain: (280(82) kPa) Control: (479(119) kPa) (p< 0.05). Tibialis anterior (reference muscle): Neck pain: (302(110) kPa) Control: (464 (134)) (p< 0.05) Intervention study Post-exercise PPTs in tibialis anterior were increased in the cycling group [from 311 (113) to 386 (107) kPa; p<0.01]. | Physical exercise, in general, lowers pain perception, resulting in normalisation of PPT in pain-free muscles. |
Kocur (2016), Poland | Nordic walking n: 22 (100%) Age: 54.5(3.7) Control n: 22 (100%) Age: 56.7(2.9) | Inclusions -Females 50-60 years, sedentary work for ≥ 6 h per day for ≥10 years -Moderate or mild pain (VAS <6) in cervical area -Lack of additional physical activity in free time Exclusions -Locomotor system disorders preventing physical exercises -Physical work, work in standing position, sedentary work for < 10 years -Participation in physical activity over the past year -Acute inflammatory conditions -Acute pain in the cervical area and shoulders VAS >6 -Idiopathic pain -Cardiovascular or pulomonary disorders or other internal diseases | Device: Electronic pressure algometer Force: Not specified Locations: Trapezius par desc, mid trapezius, latissimus dorsi, infraspinatus, pectoralis major, triceps brachii, brachio-radialis Measures: Test performed twice 10 s apart, second result used for calculations | Intervention -12 week Nordic walking training: 3 times a week of 1 h -Outdoors with at least 2 instructors controlling the marching technique and regulating pace -Preceded by 10 min warm-up and ended with 5-minute cool down -Intensity between 40-70% of HRR Control -Told not to change their movement routines and habits for the period of 12 weeks | There was significant improvements in PPTs for Nordic Walking: Trapezius pars descendens (1.32(0.5) to 1.99(0.6) p=0.002), Middle trapezius (2.92(0.9) to 3.30(0.8) p=0.002), Infraspinatus (1.63(0.6) to 2.93(0.8) p=0.001) Latissimus dorsi (1.66(0.6) to 2.21(0.5) p=0.02) No statistically significant improvement in PPTs were observed in pectoralis major, triceps and brachioradialis in the treatment group p=(0.12-0.39). No improvement was recorded in any muscle groups in the control group (p=0.05-0.92). | Nordic Walking has a high potential of reducing sensitivity to pressure (increased PPT) in the muscles of that region. |
Bruehl (2020), United States | Aerobic n: 44 (55.3%) Age: 40 (10) Control n: 49 (65.9%) Age: 41.9 (9.45) | Inclusions -18-55 years -Daily low back pain of ≥3 months duration, with an average past month pain intensity (VAS) of ≥3/10 -Medical provider diagnosis consistent with CLBP -No self-reported history of liver or kidney disorders, PTSD, BPD, psychotic disorder, diabetes, seizure disorder, alcohol or drug dependence, or daily use of opioid analgesics -Engaged in moderate or vigorous exercise <2 days per week and <60 min per week Exclusions -Self-reporting CP related to malignancy or autoimmune disorders -Pregnancy | Device: Computerised Medoc TSAII NeuroSensory Analyser Force: 40 °C and increasing at a ramp rate of 0.5 °C per second until tolerance was reached Locations: slightly different location of the ventral forearm for each stimulus to avoid local sensitization effects Measures: 3 trials were conducted for heat pain tolerance (with the mean value used for analyses) | Intervention -Supervised, individual aerobic exercise training program 3 times per week for 6 weeks -Exercise session included a 5-minute warm-up, 30 min of aerobic exercise and a 5-minute cool-down -Treadmill walking/running, stepping, elliptical, or cycling exercise as preferred by the participant -Duration and intensity of exercise was progressively increased -Participants began with 10-15 min of exercise at 40-55% HRR (RPE =11-12, light) during the first week, 20-30 min of exercise at 55-70% HRR (RPE = 12-13, somewhat hard) during the second week, then 30 min of exercise at 70-85% HRR (RPE=14-16, hard) for the remainder of the study Control -Asked to maintain their normal daily activity levels throughout the study | Baseline Evoked thermal pain responses at baseline did not differ significantly between groups. Post-exercise -Significant main effect of intervention Group on MPQ-SF Total ratings [F(1,77) =5.80, P =0.018, h2 = 0.064] -Participants in the exercise group displayed slightly improved pain responsiveness (decreased thermal pain ratings) after the 6-week intervention (M = 0.33, SE =0.70), whereas control group participants reported an increase in thermal pain responses over time (M=22.04, SE= 0.68) -However, group-level mean reduction in evoked pain responsiveness observed in the exercise condition was not significantly different from zero [t(37) 5 0.63, P = 0.54] -Women in the exercise group exhibited significantly larger increases in EO function (M = 1.68, SE = 0.91) than women in the control group [M = -0.93, SE =0.80; F(1,46) = 5.35, P =0.025]. This intervention effect was not significant in men. | Supervised progressive aerobic exercise training can significantly decrease pain in individuals with CLBP, with evidence supporting enhanced pain inhibitory function. |