Skip to main content

Table 4 Pearson correlation between implant design, time to revision, reason for revision, surface roughness and Hood score. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05

From: Comparative retrieval analysis of antioxidant polyethylene: bonding of vitamin-E does not reduce in-vivo surface damage

Pearson correlation

Implant type (Persona® - NexGen®)

Time to revision

Reason for revision

Roughness

Hood score

Instability

Malalignment

Patellofemoral

Stiffness

Tibial total

Femoral total

Articulating total

Backside

Overall total

Implant type (Persona® - NexGen®)

1***

−0.53**

0.43*

−0.01

0.39

−0.09

−0.88***

−0.15

0.01

−0.26

−0.16

Time to revision

−0.53**

1

0.09

− 0.16

− 0.43*

− 0.4

0.34

− 0.39

0.26

− 0.03

0.14

Reason for revision

Instability

0.43**

0.09

1

−0.36

0.01

−0.51*

− 0.53**

− 0.25

0.2

0.23

0.26

Malalignment

−0.01

−0.16

− 0.36

1

0.16

0.16

−0.04

0.01

−0.22

−0.62**

− 0.52*

Patellofemoral

0.39

−0.43*

0.01

0.16

1

0.09

−0.31

0.13

−0.6**

−0.43

− 0.63**

Stiffness

−0.09

−0.4

− 0.51*

0.16

0.09

1

0.18

0.52*

−0.06

0.14

0.05

Roughness

Tibial total

−0.88***

0.34

−0.53**

−0.04

− 0.31

0.18

1

0.06

−0.11

0.26

0.1

Femoral total

−0.15

−0.39

− 0.25

0.01

0.13

0.52*

−0.06

1

−0.07

0.32

0.16

Hood score

Articulating total

0.01

0.26

0.2

−0.22

−0.6**

−0.06

− 0.11

−0.07

1

0.32

0.8***

Backside

−0.26

−0.03

0.23

−0.62**

− 0.43

0.14

0.26

0.32

0.32

1

0.82***

Overall total

−0.16

0.14

0.26

−0.52*

−0.63**

0.05

0.1

0.16

0.8***

0.82***

1