Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis

Study, year

Location

Study period

Study design

Diagnosis

Simple size (Male/Female)

Mean age (year)

Follow-up (month)

NOS

MIS-TLIF

OLIF

MIS-TLIF

OLIF

MIS-TLIF

OLIF

Lin, [26], 2018

South Korea

2012-2017

Retrospective cohort study (matched-pair)

spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis

8/17

8/17

64 ± 10.5

64 ± 7.4

40 ± 17.1

29 ± 10.5

6★

Chen [27], 2018

China

2016-2017

Retrospective cohort study

Spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, disc herniation and scoliosis

6/7

6/12

66 ± 12

66 ± 11

11 ± 3.3

11 ± 3.3

6★

Qiu, [28], 2020

China

2018

Retrospective cohort study (matched-pair)

Spondylolisthesis

13/7

15/5

51.7 ± 8.7

50.3 ± 8.8

14.1 ± 2.8

13.5 ± 2.3

7★

Sheng [29], 2020

China

2014-2018

Retrospective cohort study

Spinal stenosis

23/28

5/27

60.6 ± 12.4

65.3 ± 8.9

≥12

≥12

6★

Kokie [30], 2020

Japan

2013-2017

Retrospective cohort study

Spondylolisthesis

18/30

20/18

70.1 ± 11.5

2.1 ± 11.4

22.5 ± 12.8

18.1 ± 8.5

6★

Kotani [31], 2020-1

Japan

2013-2018

Retrospective cohort study

Spondylolisthesis

17/33

46/46

70.0 ± 11.2

72.0 ± 9.9

57.2 ± 7.2

31 ± 11.5

7★

Kotani [32], 2020-2

Japan

2012-2018

Retrospective cohort study

Spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc herniation and pseudarthrosis

25/13

15/18

64.7 ± 15.3

63.1 ± 12.5

31.0 ± 20.0

25.4 ± 7.6

7★

  1. MIS-TLIF minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion, OLIF oblique lateral interbody fusion, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale