Skip to main content

Table 3 Non- modifiable risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and the outcomes of meta-analysis

From: Patients’ risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 40 studies

Comparisons

Number of studies

RR (95% CI)

Heterogeneity

I2, p-value*

p-value#

1. Gender

19

1.17 (1.03–1.32)

83.9%, < 0.001

 

1.1 Location

   

0.804

 North America

7

1.16 (1.02–1.32)

68.8%, 0.004

 

 Asia-Pacific

5

1.22 (0.80–1.87)

67.7%, 0.015

 

 Europe

7

1.13 (0.78–1.63)

88.5%, < 0.001

 

1.2 Follow-up years

   

0.787

 ≥ 3

6

1.35 (1.13–1.62)

91.0%, < 0.001

 

 < 3

13

1.16 (1.00–1.33)

56.6%, 0.006

 

1.3 Study design

   

0.078

Prospective

7

1.39 (1.13–1.72)

76.1%, < 0.001

 

 Retrospective

12

1.04 (0.89–1.23)

75.4%, < 0.001

 

1.4 Confounders adjusted

   

0.601

 Multivariate

15

1.15 (1.01–1.32)

87.4%, < 0.001

 

 Univariate

4

1.30 (0.93–1.81)

0.0%, 0.841

 

1.5 Quality

   

0.684

 < 7

8

1.23 (0.98–1.55)

44.3%, 0.083

 

 ≥ 7

11

1.14 (0.97–1.33)

89.9%, < 0.001

 

2. Age

7

0.85 (0.71–1.01)

59.0%, 0.023

 
  1. p-value* for Heterogeneity; p-value# for meta regression