Peer Review reports
From: Re-evaluating the necessity of routine laboratory tests after high tibial osteotomy surgery
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Jan 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Feb 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - si nie |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Feb 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joost Rutges |
| 12 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 24 Apr 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - si nie |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Apr 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 May 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - si nie |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 May 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Hong-bo li |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 6 Aug 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Hong-bo li |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 6 Aug 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Aug 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Aug 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12891-021-04608-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.