Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included studies
Author | Publication year | Study design (level of evidence) | Journal | Case (sample size) | Control (sample size) | Sex (M/F) | Average age (years) | Mean follow-up (years) | Osteotomy type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | |||||||
Jing et al | 2019 | Case-series study (IV) | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery | HTO with MMPRT all-inside repair (27) | Â | 12/15 | Â | 55 | Â | 1.5 | Â | MOWHTO |
Lee et al | 2019 | Comparative study (III) | Journal of Knee Surgery | HTO with MMPRT all-inside repair (25) | HTO alone (32) | 8/18 | 10/24 | 58 | 60 | 1.9 | 2.2 | MOWHTO |
Ke et al | 2020 | Comparative study (II) | Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | HTO with MMPRT all-inside repair (30) | HTO alone (34) | 4/26 | 8/26 | 55 | 55 | 2.4 | 2.5 | MOWHTO |
Kim et al | 2020 | Case-series study (IV) | Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | HTO with MMPRT pull-out repair (17) | Â | 2/15 | Â | 51.5 | Â | 5.5 | Â | MOWHTO |
Lee et al | 2020 | Comparative study (III) | Arthroscopy | HTO with MMPRT all-inside repair (24) HTO with MMPRT pull-out repair (25) | HTO alone (22) | All-inside repair: 1/23 Pull-out repair: 2/23 | 2/20 | All-inside repair: 57 Pull-out repair: 54 | 57 | All-inside repair: 2.2 Pull-out repair: 2.3 | 2.4 | MOWHTO |
Suh et al | 2020 | Comparative study (III) | Indian Journal of Orthopaedics | HTO with MMPRT all-inside repair (43) | HTO alone (38) | 8/35 | 8/30 | 55.7 | 56.2 | 2 | 2 | MOWHTO |