Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis for coxa valga (right side)

From: Multivariate analysis of the relationship between gluteal muscle contracture and coxa valga

Factor

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

OR

95%CI

P value

OR

95%CI

P value

Age (≥40/30–39/< 30)

0.713

0.426, 1.193

0.198

   

Gender (male/female)

0.833

0.453, 1.532

0.556

   

Weight (kg)

0.983

0.960, 1.006

0.138

   

Height (cm)

0.969

0.934, 1.005

0.090

   

BMI (> 25/18.5–25/< 18.5)

0.886

0.527, 1.489

0.647

   

GMC (+/−)

35.583

4.800, 263.785

0.000

91.240

7.371, 1129.412

0.000

LCEA (> 40/25–40/< 25)

0.657

0.335, 1.289

0.222

   

Tönnis (> 10/0–10/< 0)

1.242

0.737, 2.093

0.416

   

FHCI (< 0.75/ ≥0.75)

5.355

1.505, 19.055

0.010

4.240

1.030, 17.456

0.045

acetabular depth (< 0.9/ ≥0.9)

2.302

0.815, 6.503

0.116

16.504

1.893, 143.886

0.011

SFP angle (> 80/60–80/< 60)

0.889

0.419, 1.886

0.760

   

OF ratio (> 1.4/0.7–1.4/< 0.7)

0.867

0.414, 1.818

0.706

   
  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NSA Neck–shaft angle, LCEA lateral center edge angle, FHCI femoral head coverage index, SFP angle Sacro-femoral-pubic angle, OF ratio obturator foramen ratio, BMI body mass index, GMC gluteal muscle contracture
Back to article page

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us