Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review

Original Submission
18 Dec 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Ilari Kuitunen
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Ilari Kuitunen
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Palash Chandra Banik
4 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Ilari Kuitunen
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Ilari Kuitunen
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 May 2021 Author responded Author comments - Ilari Kuitunen
Resubmission - Version 6
6 May 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 May 2021 Author responded Author comments - Ilari Kuitunen
Resubmission - Version 7
15 May 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 May 2021 Editorially accepted
28 May 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12891-021-04379-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page