Skip to main content

Table 1 Pre- and peri-operative data for patients who received the allocated treatment

From: Despite higher revision rate, MoM large-head THA offers better clinical scores than HR: 14-year results from a randomized controlled trial involving 48 patients

Factor

HR

LDH THA

P

n = 24

n = 24

Gender (male/female)

14/10

15/9

0.9

Primary diagnosis

  

1

 Primary osteoarthritis

18

19

 

 Protrusio acetabuli

1

1

 

 Post-traumatic arthritis

1

–

 Hip dysplasia

2

1

 

 Osteonecrosis

1

2

 Rheumatoid arthritis

1

–

 Post-septic arthritis

–

1

Age in years at surgery mean (SD)

50 (7.1)

50 (7.8)

0.6

BMI mean (SD)

28 (5.9)

28 (4.1)

1

Acetabular vertical angle mean (SD)

49 (7.5)

43 (8)

0.01

HR femoral component CCD angle mean (SD)

142 (7.7)

–

–

Acetabular cup diameter mean (SD)

54 (3.8)

54 (3.8)

0.9

Bearing diameter, mean (SD)

48 (3.8)

48 (3.8)

0.9

  1. HR Hip resurfacing, LDH THA Large diameter head total hip arthroplasty, BMI Body mass index, CCD Cervico diaphyseal angle