Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics of study population

From: Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years

 

The baseline

Final follow-up

N of knees (patients)

125

119

41

39

Age (median, range)

71.7

31.2–95.3

67.1

42.0–85.1

Body mass index (median, range)

29.3

18.8–52.0

30.6

23.1–43.0

Follow-up, years (median, range)

6.2

0.0–12.7

7.3

4.0–12.7

Females (knees, %)

91

73%

30

73%

Number of previous knee surgeries (median, range)a

2

1–6

2

1–5

Indications for revision RHK (knees), N (%)

 Instability

54

43.2%

22

53.7%

 Prosthetic joint infection

26

20.8%

6

14.6%

 Loosening, wear and osteolysis

20

16.0%

3

7.3%

 Periprosthetic fracture

11

8.8%

3

7.3%

 Complication of the extensor mechanismb

7

5.6%

2

4.9%

 Malalignment

6

4.8%

4

9.8%

 Arthrofibrosis

1

0.8%

1

2.4%

Stability of patella preoperatively, N (%)

 Stable

66

52.8%

21

51.2%

 Subluxation

11

8.8%

3

7.3%

 Chronic dislocation

11

8.8%

5

12.2%

 Fragmentation/Demineralization

4

3.2%

2

4.8%

 Girdlestone/Spacer/Flap

4

3.2%

1

2.4%

 Fracture

3

2.4%

1

2.4%

Instability of knee, N (%)

 Antero-Posterior

47

37.6%

15

36.6%

 Medio-Lateral

82

65.6%

28

68.3%

Pre-revision bone defects (AORI, N (%))c

 Tibia

  grade 1

87

69.6%

30

73.2

  grade 2a

12

9.6%

5

12.2%

  grade 2b

11

8.8%

3

7.3%

  grade 3

15

12.0%

3

7.3%

 Femur

  grade 1

90

72.0%

34

82.9%

  grade 2a

10

8.0%

2

4.9%

  grade 2b

9

7.2%

1

2.4%

  grade 3

16

12.8%

4

9.8%

  1. aincluding the index primary operation and possibly the spacer procedure
  2. bincluding patellar ligament ruptures and impaired extensor mechanism
  3. cAccording to Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification.