Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of Demographic Data, Clinical Data, and Treatment Level

From: Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study

 

3.7 mm endoscope (n = 12)

6.9 mm endoscope (n = 16)

p value*

Baseline Characteristics

 Female sex (%)

4 (33)

8 (50)

(P > 0.05)

 Mean age (range), yr

40.3 (24–79)

40.5 (29–81)

(P > 0.05)

 Mean duration of symptoms (range), wk

14 (7–48)

16 (3–39)

(P > 0.05)

Indications for surgery

 Radiculopathy

12

16

(P > 0.05)

Treatment level

 C4–C5 (%)

2 (16)

1 (6)

(P > 0.05)

 C5–C6 (%)

3 (24)

4 (25)

(P > 0.05)

 C6–C7 (%)

7 (60)

10 (63)

(P > 0.05)

 C7–T1 (%)

0 (0)

1 (6)

(P > 0.05)

  1. *p value represents the significant difference in the basic characteristics between patients with the use of the 3.7 mm endoscope and patients with the use of the 6.9 mm endoscope, and P > 0.05 indicates that no statistically significant differences were observed