Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants, mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework

From: Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework to determine the predictors of falls and fractures in people with osteoarthritis or at high risk of developing osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

 

OA participants (n = 2270)a

Non-OA participants (n = 2526)

Fall and fracture outcomes

Self-reported fallers, n (%)

1627

72

1596

63

Self-reported history of fracture, n (%)

382

17

359

14

Personal factors

Age, mean (SD)

62.0

8.9

60.4

9.4

Female, n (%)

1405

62

1399

55

Number of co-morbid conditions, n (%)

None

1171

73

1489

79

One or more

445

28

406

21

Depression, mean (SD)

7.3

7.5

6.0

6.5

Opioid use, n (%)

218

10

36

1

Bisphosphonate use, n (%)

291

13

285

11

Previous history of falls, n (%)

933

41

774

31

Environmental factors

Married, n (%)

1466

65

1712

68

Lived alone, n (%)

515

23

540

21

Impairments in body function and structures (OA impairments)

KOOS pain scale, mean (SD)

72.0

20.3

84.1

16.4

WOMAC stiffness scale, mean (SD)

2.5

1.8

1.5

1.5

Flexor strength (N/kg), mean (SD)

1.8

0.8

2.0

0.2

Extensor strength (N/kg), mean (SD)

4.4

1.5

4.8

1.5

Activity limitations

WOMAC physical function scale, mean (SD)

14.6

13.2

7.4

9.9

Chair stands (stands/seconds, mean (SD)

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.2

20 m walk test (m/seconds), mean (SD)

1.3

0.2

1.3

0.2

400 m walk test (seconds), mean (SD)

313.9

60.6

300.8

53.5

Participation restrictions

Employed, n (%)

1326

58

1671

66

Physical activity (PASE), mean (SD)

155.9

82.8

165.3

82.0

KOOS sport and recreation scale, mean (SD)

63.8

27.1

79.4

22.7

  1. OA osteoarthritis, SD standard deviation, KOOS Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, PASE Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
  2. Significant results (p ≤ 0.05) in bold
  3. aOf these, 131 participants were diagnosed with OA at Year 8 visit and excluded from further analysis