Acetabular- and femoral orientation after periacetabular osteotomy as a predictor for outcome and osteoarthritis

Table 3 Correlation of postoperative radiological hip morphologies and functional outcome

	Difference Pre- and Postoperative WOMAC Score	Postoperative Oxford Hip Score	GTO
Acetabular sector Angle
15:00	0.505	0.648	0.854
14:00	0.707	0.234	0.143
13:00	0.247	0.359	0.983
12:00	0.179	0.145	0.140
11:00	0.304	0.258	0.926
10:00	0.939	0.535	0.101
09:00	0.294	0.766	0.134
horizontal 9 + 15	0.224	0.719	0.266
Anteversion
+ 1	0.669	0.227	0.960
+ 0.5	0.390	0.603	0.567
Femoral head center	0.898	0.593	0.706
-0.5	0.641	0.423	0.700
Alpha Angle
15:00	0.080	0.789	0.874
14:00	0.561	0.292	0.702
13:00	0.714	0.916	0.550
12:00	0.153	0.748	0.470 (0.000)
11:00	0.077	0.847	0.259 (0.047)
10:00	0.162	0.407	0.308 (0.017)
09:00	0.979	0.651	0.058
Antetorsion	0.342	0.319	0.507
Combined Anteversion	0,500	0.835	0.584

Table 3 Correlation analysis between radiographic angles (Acetabular sector angle, Anteversion, Alpha angle, Antetorsion, Combined antetorsion) and PROMs (difference between Pre- and postoperative WOMAC Score, postoperative Oxford Hip score and GTO global treatment outcome) with display of the correlation coefficient and if significant p value in parentheses

ISSN: 1471-2474