Peer Review reports
From: Is retrospective assessment of health-related quality of life valid?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Dec 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bayram Unver |
17 Dec 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thea Vliet Vlieland |
1 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Lawson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thea Vliet Vlieland |
28 Apr 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Lawson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Apr 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 May 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Lawson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 May 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Jun 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Lawson |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Jun 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
17 Jun 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Jun 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12891-020-03434-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.