Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the control and co-management (intervention) groups

From: Orthogeriatric co-management for proximal femoral fractures. Can two additions make a big difference?

Characteristic

Control group

Intervention group

p

Patients, n

103

104

 

Age, y

84.73 ± 6.66

84.19 ± 7.6

0.731

Women

72 (69.9)

73 (70.2)

> 0.9999

Fracture type

 Femoral neck

43 (41.7)

48 (46.2)

0.576

 Intertrochanteric

54 (52.4)

55 (52.9)

> 0.9999

 Subtrochanteric

6 (5.8)

1 (1)

0.065

Surgical technique

 Arthroplasty

38 (36.9)

40 (38.5)

0.886

 Dynamic hip screw

20 (19.4)

26 (25)

0.404

 Proximal femoral nail

45 (43.7)

37 (35.6)

0.257

 Locking Plate

0 (0)

1 (1)

> 0.9999

CCI

1.79 ± 1.96

1.71 ± 1.49

0.743

ASA Score

  

0.813

 1–2

32 (31.1)

35 (33.7)

 

 3

63 (61.2)

63 (60.6)

 

  ≥ 4

8 (7.8)

6 (5.8)

 

AHFS (risk of 30-day mortality)

  

0.609

 Low risk (< 10)

66 (64.7)

64 (62.7)

 

 Medium risk (10–12)

29 (28.4)

27 (26.5)

 

 High risk (> 13)

7 (6.9)

11 (10.8)

 

Residential setting

  

0.930

 At home (independent)

43 (41.7)

45 (43.3)

 

 At home with help

23 (22.3)

21 (20.2)

 

 Nursing home

37 (35.9)

38 (36.5)

 

Grade of care

  

0.563

 0–1

60 (59.4)

53 (52.5)

 

 2

17 (16.8)

15 (14.9)

 

 3

13 (12.9)

19 (18.8)

 

 4–5

11 (10.9)

14 (13.9)

 

Walking aids

 None

51 (50.5)

45 (44.1)

0.400

 Stick/crutches

4 (4)

4 (3.9)

> 0.9999

 Walking frame

43 (42.6)

47 (46.1)

0.672

 Wheelchair

2 (2)

4 (3.9)

0.683

 Bedridden

1 (1)

2 (2)

> 0.9999

Parker Mobility Score

7.24 ± 1.96

6.72 ± 2.28

0.129

  1. Values are the number of patients (%) or the mean ± SD, unless indicated otherwise