Skip to main content

Table 5 Intervention reporting assessment for each included study*

From: Exercise for people with a fragility fracture of the pelvis or lower limb: a systematic review of interventions evaluated in clinical trials and reporting quality

  1. *C Clearly reported, UC Unclear/uncertain, NR Not reported, N/A Not applicable
  2. a Duration of phase one sessions was C, duration of phase two sessions was NR
  3. b Time from fracture/surgery to enrolment/baseline assessment/beginning of study/admission to rehab centre was C. When the intervention commenced after fracture/surgery was NR or UC
  4. c Duration of the usual component of the experimental intervention was C. Duration of the additional components of the experimental intervention was NR or UC
  5. d4 Authors reported some/all of the exercise intervention was individualised but how this was achieved was NR or UC
  6. e Treatment group received no intervention
  7. f Whether the usual care component of the experimental intervention was group-based/individually completed was NR or UC. Whether the additional components of the experimental intervention were group-based/individually completed was C
  8. g Duration of usual care component of the experimental intervention was NR or UC. Duration of the additional components of the experimental intervention was C
  9. h Frequency of usual care component of the experimental intervention was NR or UC. Frequency of the additional components of the experimental intervention was C
  10. i Tailoring/modification of the usual care component of the experimental intervention was NR or UC. Tailoring/modification of the additional components of the experimental intervention was C
  11. j Adherence to usual care component of the experimental arm was NR or UC. Adherence to the additional components of the experimental intervention was C
  12. k Treatment group received an intervention that did not contain an exercise/physical activity component
  13. l Who provided usual care component of the experimental intervention was C. Who provided the additional components of the experimental intervention was NR or UC
  14. m Specifics of the usual care component of the experimental arm were NR or UC. Specifics of the additional components of the experimental intervention were C
  15. n Exercise component of this treatment group was the same as the ‘Resistance exercise’ treatment group
  16. o Contradictory information for this domain is presented in the article and the article appendix
  17. p Exercise component of this treatment group was the same as the ‘Resistance and aerobic exercise’ treatment group
  18. q Adherence to treatment was NR separately for stroke and hip fracture participants
  19. r Who provided usual care component of the experimental intervention was NR or UC. Who provided the additional components of the experimental intervention was C
  20. s Time from fracture/surgery to commencing usual care component of the experimental intervention was NR or UC. Time from fracture/surgery to commencing the additional components of the experimental intervention was C
  21. t Time from fracture/surgery to commencing the usual care component of the experimental intervention was C. Time from fracture/surgery to commencing the additional components of the experimental intervention was NR or UC
  22. u Frequency of the usual care component of the experimental intervention was C. Frequency of the additional components of the experimental intervention was NR
Back to article page

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us