Table 3 EPHPP quality assessment ratings
From: Antibiotic prophylaxis in primary and revision shoulder replacement: a systematic review
Authors, year | Global rating | Selection Bias | Study Design | Confounders | Blinding | Data Collection Methods | Withdrawals and Drop-Outs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pérez-Prieto, 2016[19] | Weak | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Kong Koh, 2016[20] | Weak | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Moderate |
Lutz, 2005[21] | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Oprica, 2004[22] | Weak | Strong | Weak | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Matsen, 2015[23] | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Moderate |
Al-Mayahi, 2015[25] | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Parada, 2018[24] | Weak | Weak | Weak | Strong | Weak | Strong | Moderate |