(nRCT) Study = 6 | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5A | Item 5B | Item 6 | Item 7 | Item 8 | Score |
 Goldstein WM et al. (2001) [23] | * | * |  |  | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
 Tsai SJ et al. (2008) [24] | * | * |  | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
 White Jr. RE (2001) [25] | * | * | * | * | * |  | * | * | * | 8 |
 Pellicci PM et al. (1998) [27] | * | * |  | * |  | * | * | * | * | 7 |
 Suh KT et al (2004) [28] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
 Yamaguchi T et al. (2003) [21] | * |  | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Methodological Assessment According to Six Domains of Potential Biases (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool) | ||||||||||
RCT Study = 2 | Random Sequence Generation | Allocation Concealment | Blinding of Participants and Personnel | Blinding of Outcome Assessment | Incomplete Outcome Data | SelectiveReporting | Other Bias | Overall Bias | ||
 Chiu FY et al. (2000) [22] | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | ||
 Tarasevicius S et al. (2010) [29] | Low | Low | Low | Low | High | High | Unclear | High |