Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk-of-bias assessment for the studies included in the meta-analysis (NOS)

From: The effect of posterior capsule repair in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

(nRCT) Study = 6

Item 1

Item 2

Item 3

Item 4

Item 5A

Item 5B

Item 6

Item 7

Item 8

Score

 Goldstein WM et al. (2001) [23]

*

*

  

*

*

*

*

*

7

 Tsai SJ et al. (2008) [24]

*

*

 

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

 White Jr. RE (2001) [25]

*

*

*

*

*

 

*

*

*

8

 Pellicci PM et al. (1998) [27]

*

*

 

*

 

*

*

*

*

7

 Suh KT et al (2004) [28]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

 Yamaguchi T et al. (2003) [21]

*

 

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

Methodological Assessment According to Six Domains of Potential Biases (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool)

RCT Study = 2

Random Sequence Generation

Allocation Concealment

Blinding of Participants and Personnel

Blinding of Outcome Assessment

Incomplete Outcome Data

SelectiveReporting

Other Bias

Overall Bias

 Chiu FY et al. (2000) [22]

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

 Tarasevicius S et al. (2010) [29]

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

High

Unclear

High

  1. NOS Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, RCT Randomized controlled trial, nRCT Nonrandomized controlled trial