Skip to main content

Table 6 Random Effects Standard Deviation of Different Models for Sensitivity Analysis

From: Effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Bayesian meta-analysis

Outcome Model for Random Effects Standard Deviation Median (95% CI)
Change of Cobb angle Consistency model 6.28 (4.20, 9.67)
Inconsistency model 6.40 (4.31, 9.95)
Incidence of complications Consistency model 1.14 (0.02, 2.31)
Inconsistency model 1.26 (0.38, 2.39)
Change of absolute FEV1 Consistency model 0.29 (0.18, 0.50)
inconsistency model 0.26 (0.11, 0.49)
Change of absolute FVC Consistency model 0.27 (0.13, 0.53)
Inconsistency model 0.24 (0.07, 0.52)
  1. FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC forced vital capacity