Skip to main content

Table 6 Random Effects Standard Deviation of Different Models for Sensitivity Analysis

From: Effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Bayesian meta-analysis

Outcome

Model for Random Effects Standard Deviation

Median (95% CI)

Change of Cobb angle

Consistency model

6.28 (4.20, 9.67)

Inconsistency model

6.40 (4.31, 9.95)

Incidence of complications

Consistency model

1.14 (0.02, 2.31)

Inconsistency model

1.26 (0.38, 2.39)

Change of absolute FEV1

Consistency model

0.29 (0.18, 0.50)

inconsistency model

0.26 (0.11, 0.49)

Change of absolute FVC

Consistency model

0.27 (0.13, 0.53)

Inconsistency model

0.24 (0.07, 0.52)

  1. FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC forced vital capacity