Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the 28 included studies

From: Effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Bayesian meta-analysis

Source

Study design

Country

Interventions

Sample size

Follow-up (year)

Outcomes for analysis

Dobbs 2006 [26]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

ASR + PSF vs PSF

20/34

2.4

Zhang 2012 [52]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

ASR + PSF vs PSF

31/33

2

,

Zhang 2009 [41]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

ASR + PSF vs PSF

32/94

3.4

Qiu 2011 [42]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

VAT+PSF vs PSF

18/27

3.65

,

Zhang 2011 [51]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

ASR + PSF vs PSF

12/17

3

Kim 2005 [34]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

PSF vs WT vs ASF vs ASR + PSF

49/41/16/12

5

Bullmann 2013 [46]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Germany

ASF vs WT

40/29

2

, ,

Vedantam 2000 [44]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

PSF vs WT vs ASF vs ASR + PSF

47/33/7/11

2

, ,

Kim 2008 [33]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

WT vs ASF

35/29

2

,

Faro 2005 [28]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

VAT vs ASF

31/23

1

, ,

Kishan 2007 [35]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

VAT vs WT

36/43

2

,

Lenke 2004 [15]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

VAT+PSF vs ASR + PSF

21/16

2

, ,

Verma 2011 [45]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

PSF vs ASF vs VAT vs VAT+PSF

70/35/32/22

2

, ,

Zhou 2011 [49]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

PSF vs WT

24/20

2

, , ,

Greggi 2010 [31]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Italy

WT vs PSF

40/40

5

, , ,

Lonner 2009 [37]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

VAT vs PSF

17/17

2

Newton 2013 [40]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

VAT vs ASF vs PSF

55/17/77

2

, ,

Suk 2008 [43]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Korea

PSF vs WT

37/20

2

, , ,

Graham 2000 [30]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

WT vs ASF

31/20

2

,

Miljenko 2006 [29]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Croatia

ASF vs PSF

25/25

2

Lenke 1999 [36]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

ASF vs PSF

70/53

2

Wong 2004 [48]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Singapore

PSF vs VAT

19/12

2

Muschik 2006 [39]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Germany

ASF vs PSF

37/104

2

,

Lonner 2006 [38]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

USA

VAT vs PSF

28/23

2

Hee 2007 [32]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

Singapore

ASF vs PSF

25/11

3.7

Wang 2008 [47]

Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

ASF vs PSF

16/16

2

Dong 2015 [27]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

ASF vs PSF

17/36

2

,

Zhan 2010 [50]

Retrospective nonrandomized controlled trial

China

ASF vs PSF

22/20

2

,

  1. AIS adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; : change of Cobb angle; : change of absolute forced vital capacity (FVC); : change of absolute forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1); : incidence of complications; ASR + PSF combined anterior release and posterior fusion with instrumentation, VAT+PSF combined video assisted anterior release and posterior fusion with instrumentation without thoracoplasty, PSF posterior fusion with instrumentation without thoracoplasty, ASF anterior fusion with instrumentation and thoracotomy without thoracoplasty, VAT video assisted anterior fusion with instrumentation without thoracoplasty, WT any scoliosis surgery with additional thoracoplasty or multiple convex rib resections