Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of radiographic parameters at the time of second-look operation

From: The effect of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the patellofemoral joint: comparative analysis according to the preexisting cartilage status

Variable

Group 1

(n = 59)

Group 2

(n = 33)

P value

Load-bearing axis deviation a (%)

64.3 ± 9.2

64.2 ± 6.4

0.983

Hip-Knee-Ankle angle a (valgus, °)

4.3 ± 2.6

4.0 ± 1.7

0.542

Medial proximal tibial angle a (°)

93.7 ± 3.0

93.5 ± 2.4

0.807

Joint line convergence angle a (°)

1.8 ± 2.2

1.7 ± 2.0

0.846

Posterior tibial slope (°)

6.8 ± 4.6

7.7 ± 4.0

0.346

Blackburne-Peel ratio a

0.7 ± 0.1

0.8 ± 0.2

0.146

Caton-Deschamps ratio a

0.8 ± 0.2

0.9 ± 0.2

0.107

Lateral patellofemoral angle a (°)

13.5 ± 4.2

12.3 ± 5.6

0.258

Kellgren–Lawrence gradeb

  

0.441

 Grade 1

0 (0.0%)

1 (3.0%)

 

 Grade 2

8 (13.6%)

7 (21.2%)

 

 Grade 3

43 (72.9%)

21 (63.6%)

 

 Grade 4

8 (13.6%)

4 (12.1%)

 

Patellofemoral osteoarthritis stage according to Iwano’s classificationb

  

0.124

 Stage 0

8 (13.6%)

10 (30.3%)

 

 Stage 1

25 (42.4%)

13 (39.4%)

 

 Stage 2

26 (44.1%)

10 (30.3%)

 
  1. a The values are given as the mean and standard deviation
  2. b The values are given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parenthesis