Skip to main content

Table 2 proximal/distal tibial outcomes evaluated by new tibial torsion method and traditional tibial method

From: Analysis of the effect of tibial torsion on tibial osteotomy in knee arthroplasty using a three-dimensional computed tomography-based modelling technique

  Post-op varus Post-op neutral Post-op valgus P value
New tibial torsion method Proximal 43.03 ± 21.13 41.6 ± 17.28 25.12 ± 15.22 p = 0.03
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.356
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.009
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.001
Distal 59.61 ± 19.15 56.94 ± 20.1 75.55 ± 12.0 p = 0.02
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.987
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.091
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.013
Conventional tibial method Proximal 26.94 ± 9.01 28.67 ± 8.01 27.67 ± 8.9 p = 0.782
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.485
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.512
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.824
Distal 2.89 ± 2.1 3.17 ± 2.5 3.81 ± 2.3 p = 0.753
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.501
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.702
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.782
  1. Data were presented as average mean ± SD. A significant difference between groups was considered for p < 0.05