Table 2 proximal/distal tibial outcomes evaluated by new tibial torsion method and traditional tibial method
Post-op varus | Post-op neutral | Post-op valgus | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New tibial torsion method | Proximal | 43.03 ± 21.13 | 41.6 ± 17.28 | 25.12 ± 15.22 | p = 0.03 |
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.356 | |||||
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.009 | |||||
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.001 | |||||
Distal | 59.61 ± 19.15 | 56.94 ± 20.1 | 75.55 ± 12.0 | p = 0.02 | |
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.987 | |||||
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.091 | |||||
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.013 | |||||
Conventional tibial method | Proximal | 26.94 ± 9.01 | 28.67 ± 8.01 | 27.67 ± 8.9 | p = 0.782 |
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.485 | |||||
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.512 | |||||
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.824 | |||||
Distal | 2.89 ± 2.1 | 3.17 ± 2.5 | 3.81 ± 2.3 | p = 0.753 | |
Varus vs. neutral P = 0.501 | |||||
Valgus vs. neutral P = 0.702 | |||||
Varus vs. valgus P = 0.782 | |||||