Table 5 BML change (baseline to follow-up) between the three groups
Site | BML change | ACLR isolated (n = 32) | ACLR combined (n = 25) | Controls (n = 9) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medial tibia | Progression | 9 (28%) | 5 (20%) | 0 (0) | 0.25 |
Stable | 15 (47%) | 9 (36%) | 6 (67%) | 0.29 | |
Regression | 8 (25%) | 11 (44%) | 3 (33%) | 0.46 | |
Medial femoral condyle | Progression | 3 (9%) | 3 (12%) | 0 (0) | 0.85 |
Stable | 25 (78%) | 19 (76%) | 9 (100%) | 0.33 | |
Regression | 4 (13%) | 3 (12%) | 0 (0) | 0.74 | |
Lateral tibia | Progression | 7 (22%) | 4 (16%) | 0 (0) | 0.43 |
Stable | 11 (34%) a | 12 (48%) b | 9 (100%) a, b | 0.001* | |
Regression | 14 (44%) a | 9 (36%) b | 0 (0) 1 2 | 0.04* | |
Lateral femoral condyle | Progression | 4 (13%) | 5 (20%) | 2 (22%) | 0.59 |
Stable | 23 (72%) | 17 (68%) | 6 (67%) | 0.94 | |
Regression | 5 (16%) | 3 (12%) | 1 (11%) | 1.0 |