Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline measurement of the hip and knee joints

From: Can short-term effectiveness of anti-pronation taping predict the long-term outcomes of customized foot orthoses: developing predictors to identify characteristics of patients with plantar heel pain likely to benefit from customized foot orthoses

Variable

All Subjects (n = 74)

Success (n = 49)

Nonsuccess (n = 25)

p value

Femoral neck anteversion, 27 deg.

7.7 ± 5.8

7.5 ± 6.3

8.0 ± 4.5

0.750

Tibial lateral torsion,32 deg

17.9 ± 7.0

18.1 ± 7.2

17.7 ± 6.9

0.825

Leg length difference,35 mm

1.0 ± 6.5

1.0 ± 5.8

1.1 ± 7.8

0.716

Quadriceps angle,34 deg

14.3 ± 5.7

14.7 ± 4.9

13.6 ± 7.0

0.452

Hip internal rotation ROM, deg

35.8 ± 13.1

33.5 ± 12.4

40.4 ± 13.4

0.030*

Hip external rotation ROM, deg

47.2 ± 12.8

49.2 ± 12.7

43.3 ± 12.3

0.060*

Straight leg raise range,36 deg

58.9 ± 14.1

57.2 ± 13.8

62.2 ± 14.4

0.157

Hip flexion ROM in Thomas test,37 deg

−19.2 ± 9.5

−19.5 ± 9.4

− 18.6 ± 9.8

0.718

Knee flexion ROM in Thomas test,37 deg

50.0 ± 14.5

50.0 ± 14.0

50.0 ± 15.7

0.999

Hip adduction ROM in Ober’s test,38 deg

14.5 ± 9.2

13.6 ± 10.1

16.4 ± 6.7

0.221

  1. *p < 0.15
  2. ROM Range of motion
  3. Data present as mean ± SD