Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of morphological parameters between the two groups

From: Morphological analysis for subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion in developmental and non-developmental canal stenosis

Level

Group

POW(mm)

TCP(number)

PTA(°)

RSA(°)

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

Total

C3

DCS

5.7 ± 0.6

4.8 ± 0.8

5.3 ± 0.7

2

5

7 (11.6%)

43.7 ± 3.4

44.4 ± 3.6

43.9 ± 3.5

10.1 ± 3.7

8.9 ± 2.8

9.3 ± 3.3

NDCS

4.7 ± 0.8

3.7 ± 1.6

4.1 ± 0.9*

8

13

21 (35.0%)#

44.5 ± 3.2

46.1 ± 3.5

45.5 ± 3.4

9.3 ± 3.6

8.2 ± 2.8

8.7 ± 3.2

C4

DCS

5.8 ± 0.6

5.0 ± 0.7

5.5 ± 0.8

3

5

8(13.3%)

47.2 ± 3.4

48.2 ± 3.4

47.6 ± 3.4

11.9 ± 3.5

10.7 ± 4.6

11.3 ± 3.8

NDCS

4.9 ± 1.1

4.0 ± 0.7

4.4 ± 0.8*

5

12

17(28.3%)#

47.2 ± 2.8

46.7 ± 3.6

46.9 ± 3.4

11.2 ± 2.6

9.8 ± 3.7

10.5 ± 3.2*

C5

DCS

6.0 ± 0.7

5.4 ± 0.6

5.8 ± 0.7

1

4

5(8.3%)

45.3 ± 4.3

45.6 ± 4.2

45.4 ± 4.3

13.1 ± 3.4

11.6 ± 2.7

12.3 ± 3.8

NDCS

5.1 ± 1.0

4.4 ± 0.7

4.7 ± 0.9*

3

10

13(21.7%)#

47.1 ± 3.0

44.8 ± 4.0

45.7 ± 3.8

11.2 ± 3.6

10.3 ± 4.9

10.8 ± 4.2*

C6

DCS

6.5 ± 0.9

5.8 ± 0.6

6.2 ± 0.7

1

4

5(8.3%)

38.9 ± 4.4

41.7 ± 4.8

40.0 ± 4.7

13.5 ± 3.0

12.3 ± 3.8

12.9 ± 3.4

NDCS

5.7 ± 1.1

4.7 ± 0.7

5.1 ± 0.9*

3

6

9(15.0%)

41.3 ± 4.5

42.6 ± 5.3

42.3 ± 4.2

11.8 ± 4.1

10.2 ± 4.6

11.0 ± 4.4*

C7

DCS

7.6 ± 0.4

6.5 ± 1.5

7.0 ± 0.8

None

None

None

33.4 ± 3.7

34.5 ± 4.8

33.8 ± 4.2

14.5 ± 3.2

12.6 ± 4.7

13.2 ± 3.9

NDCS

6.7 ± 1.6

5.6 ± 0.7

6.1 ± 0.7*

None

None

None

35.1 ± 5.3

36.2 ± 3.7

35.9 ± 4.6

13.0 ± 3.1

11.7 ± 4.2

12.2 ± 3.9*

  1. POW Pedicle outer width, TCP Tiny cervical pedicle (POW less than 4 mm), PTA Pedicle transverse angle, RSA Range of safe angle
  2. * Independent Samples T Test, P < 0.05
  3. # Pearson’s Chi Square Test, P < 0.05