Table 1 Characteristics and quality of studies included in the meta-analysis
From: Change in adduction moment following medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis
Author | Year | Study Type | Sample Size, n | Male/Female Sex, n | Mean Age, y | Measured Parameters | Time from surgery to measurement, mo | Follow-up, Mean, mo | Mechanical axis angle, degrees | Quality score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean (SD) | Final assessment Mean (SD) | ||||||||||
Birmingham et al. [9] | 2009 | PCS | 126 | 102 | 47.48 | ADM | 24 | 24 | −8.00 (4.09) | −0.05 (3.05) | 5 |
DeMeo et al. [10] | 2010 | PCS | 20 | 14 | 49.4 | ADM | 7.2 | 99.6 | −3.6 (N/R) | 7.5 (N/R) | 6 |
Kean et al. [11] | 2009 | RCS | 21 | N/R | 38.9 | ADM, FLM, EXM | 12 | 12 | −6.03 (3.29) | 0.33 (N/R) | 8 |
Leitch et al. [12] | 2015 | RCS | 14 | 12 | 48 | ADM, FLM, EXM | 12 | 12 | −7.61 (N/R) | 0.52 (N/R) | 6 |
Lind et al. [5] | 2013 | RCS | 11 | 11 | 46 | ADM, FLM, EXM | 12 | 12 | −8 (2.8) | 0 (2.1) | 7 |
Marriot et al. [13] | 2015 | PCS | 33 | N/R | 40 | ADM, FLM, EXM | 60 | 68 | −5.90 (2.87) | 1.69 (2.37) | 4 |
McClelland et al. [6] | 2016 | RCS | 36 | 33 | 54.11 | ADM | 72 | 72 | −8.6 (0.88) | −1.44 (1.05) | 6 |
Sischek et al. [14] | 2014 | RCS | 37 | 29 | 49.3 | ADM | 6 48 | N/R | −8.35 (3.33) | 1.25 (2.67) | 8 |
Birmingham et al. [15] | 2017 | PCS | 170 | 135 | 46.4 | ADM, FLM | 60 | 60 | −8.01 (3.38) | 0.28 (2.86) | 7 |