Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Mid-term follow-up results of calcaneal reconstruction for calcaneal malunion

Original Submission
6 Sep 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asbjørn Årøen
8 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diego Ariel de Lima
12 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nihal Büker
15 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Buckley
10 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hong Seop Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asbjørn Årøen
15 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Buckley
17 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diego Ariel de Lima
22 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hong Seop Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Buckley
6 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hong Seop Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
29 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12891-019-2419-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page