Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the logistic regression analysis to predict “improved” participants

From: Effects of spinal manipulative therapy biomechanical parameters on clinical and biomechanical outcomes of participants with chronic thoracic pain: a randomized controlled experimental trial

Independent variables

b (SE)

p

95% CI for Odds Ratio

Lower

Odds Ratio

Upper

Intercept

−3.51 (1.25)

0.01

   

STarT Back Screening Tool score

0.43 (0.23)

0.07

0.97

1.53

2.41

Initial expectation: positive vs negative

−1.53 (0.94)

0.11

0.03

0.22

1.37

Slope of the change in pain intensity across the four sessions

0.39 (0.14)

0.01*

1.13

1.48

1.94

Slope of the change in T6 tenderness across the four sessions

0.01 (0.01)

0.50

0.98

1.01

1.04

Slope of the change in T6 tenderness between the first two sessions

0.13 (0.07)

0.048*

1.00

1.14

1.29

Slope of the change in T7 tenderness between before-and-after the first SMT/rest

0.09 (0.15)

0.57

0.81

1.09

1.48

Slope of the change in T8 tenderness between the first two sessions

0.07 (0.05)

0.22

0.96

1.07

1.19

Slope of the change in T8 terminal spinal stiffness between the first two sessions

−1.00 (0.71)

0.16

0.09

0.37

1.48

  1. Note: A positive slope indicates an improvement. R2 = 0.36 (Cox & Snell), 0.53 (Nagelkerke). Model χ2(8) = 32.02, p < 0.001
  2. * Statistically significant predictor/variable