Skip to main content

Table 3 Participants’ characteristics at baseline for the experimental groups and the control group

From: Effects of spinal manipulative therapy biomechanical parameters on clinical and biomechanical outcomes of participants with chronic thoracic pain: a randomized controlled experimental trial

Characteristic

Dose1

−peak/−rate

Dose 2

+peak/+rate

Dose 3

+peak/−rate

Control

F3,77 or H3 value and p value

Males: Females

6: 14

8: 14

8: 13

6: 12

Age (years)

41.50 (13.79)

37.45 (13.48)

37.19 (11.14)

35.83 (13.68)

F = 0.57; p = 0.64

Weight (kg)

70.88 (12.66)

72.21 (18.80)

74.66 (18.90)

68.85 (13.15)

F = 2.03; p = 0.12

Height (m)

1.65 (0.08)

1.67 (0.07)

1.68 (0.10)

1.68 (0.07)

F = 0.69; p = 0.56

Body mass index (kg/m2)

26.12 (4.62)

28.91 (7.15)

26.09 (4.51)

24.48 (4.27)

F = 2.43; p = 0.07

Average pain intensity in the past three months (0–100, median, IQR)

30.00 (20.00)

27.50 (10.00)

30.00 (26.00)

50.00 (40.00)

H = 7.51; p = 0.06

Pain intensity at the start of the first session (0–100, median, IQR)

20.00 (10.00)

20.00 (15.00)

30.00 (29.97)

50.00 (44.00)

H = 12.06, p = 0.01*

TSK score (/68)

30.45 (7.26)

31.64 (6.89)

31.71 (8.23)

33.39 (6.17)

F = 0.53; p = 0.66

QBPDQ score (%, median, IQR)

9.00 (15.00)

16.31 (18.09)

12.92 (11.51)

12.50 (15.00)

H = 1.47 p = 0.69

SBST score (/9, median, IQR)

2.00 (3.00)

2.00 (3.00)

3.00 (3.00)

3.50 (2.00)

H = 6.73; p = 0.08

Global spinal stiffness at the first session before SMT/rest (N/mm)

T6

8.02 (1.20)

7.49 (1.62)

7.70 (1.62)

8.14 (1.43)

F = 0.81; p = 0.49

T7

7.96 (1.05)

7.38 (1.80)

7.72 (1.83)

8.03 (1.18)

F = 0.75; p = 0.52

T8

7.73 (1.18)

7.39 (1.87)

7.62 (1.98)

7.80 (1.63)

F = 0.23; p = 0.87

Terminal spinal stiffness at the first session before SMT/rest (N/mm)

T6

8.06 (1.26)

7.50 (1.65)

7.73 (1.64)

8.20 (1.44)

F = 0.88; p = 0.46

T7

7.98 (1.07)

7.41 (1.88)

7.75 (1.95)

8.06 (1.21)

F = 0.69; p = 0.56

T8

7.77 (1.24)

7.39 (1.90)

7.64 (2.07)

7.86 (1.66)

F = 0.27; p = 0.84

Tenderness during spinal stiffness assessment (%, median, IQR)

T6

18.83 (22.50)

13.33 (23.33)

16.67 (18.67)

19.17 (23.33)

H = 2.42; p = 0.49

T7

13.33 (24.33)

5.00 (16.33)

10.00 (20.00)

15.00 (16.33)

H = 2.84; p = 0.42

T8

9.33 (19.33)

4.17 (21.00)

8.33 (16.67)

10.00 (18.33)

H = 1.26; p = 0.74

Muscle response amplitude during spinal stiffness assessment (nRMS, median, IQR)

T6

0.10 (0.09)

0.13 (0.11)

0.08 (0.15)

0.11 (0.10)

H = 4.78; p = 0.19

T7

0.10 (0.06)

0.14 (0.13)

0.08 (0.06)

0.11 (0.11)

H = 5.12; p = 0.16

T8

0.09 (0.05)

0.13 (0.13)

0.08 (0.04)

0.11 (0.09)

H = 5.02; p = 0.17

Expectation (+: - or neutral)

13: 7

18: 4

18: 3

10: 8

  1. Mean and standard deviation are reported unless otherwise indicated
  2. Note: pain intensity and QBPDQ are de-transformed values
  3. * Participants in the control group presented higher pain intensity at baseline than participants in the Dose 2 group
  4. Abbreviation: IQR interquartile range, TSK Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, QBPDQ Quebec Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, SBST STarT Back Screening Tool, SMT spinal manipulative therapy, nRMS normalized root mean square