Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

Original Submission
8 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Charles Benaim
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Wassinger
27 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tatiane Mota da Silva
3 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Charles Benaim
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Wassinger
31 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Charles Benaim
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Charles Benaim
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Charles Benaim
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
12 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Charles Benaim
Resubmission - Version 7
12 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Dec 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page