| SubGroup 1 | SubGroup 2 | SubGroup 3 | SubGroup 4 | Difference between subgroups |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of total cohort (n = 266) | 50% (n = 133) | 27.4% (n = 73) | 15.4% (n = 41) | 7.1% (n = 19) |  |
 Percentage (and number) of people with LBP in each sub group cluster | 26.3% (35) | 71.2% (52) | 82.9% (34) | 100.0% (19) |  |
 Posterior probability of belonging to each cluster | 0.95 ± 0.10 | 0.91 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.08 | 0.97 ± 0.11 |  |
Post hoc analysis – demographics | |||||
 Age | 36.5 ± 13.6 3 | 37.5 ± 13.7 | 42.1 ± 14.8 | 38.1 ± 13.5 | Yes |
 Sex (female) | 60.9% | 57.5% | 56.1% | 47.3% | No |
Pain behaviour (for LBP people only) | |||||
 Pain intensity using numerical rating scale (0–10 scale) | 5.2 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 5.6 ± 1.8 | 5.3 ± 1.5 | No |
 ‘Flexion aggravates, Extension eases’ pain score (0–48 scale) a | 12.8 ± 7.3 4 | 14.5 ± 8.0 4 | 16.4 ± 8.8 4 | 22.7 ± 8.4 1,2,3 | Yes |
 Activity limitation (0–100 scale) | 31 ± 17 4 | 38 ± 20 | 42 ± 22 | 48 ± 26 1 | Yes |
 Percentage of LBP people with leg pain b | 36.3% 2,4 | 52.0% 1,4 | 21.8% 4 | 76.5% 1,2,3 | Yes |
Lumbo-pelvic flexion kinematic parameters | |||||
 Trunk Peak ROM (o) | 111 ± 12 2,3,4 | 97 ± 17 1,3,4 | 89 ± 16 1,2,4 | 77 ± 20 1,2,3 | Yes |
 Lumbar Peak ROM (o) | 51 ± 9 3 | 54 ± 10 3,4 | 30 ± 8.5 1,2,4 | 47 ± 14 2,3 | Yes |
 Pelvic ROM (o) | 60 ± 11 2,4 | 44 ± 5 1,4 | 59 ± 15 2,4 | 31 ± 11 1,2,3 | Yes |
 Percentage of lumbar contribution to trunk flexion (%) | 47 ± 7 2,3,4 | 57 ± 10 1,3 | 35 ± 9 1,2,4 | 60 ± 9 1,3 | Yes |
 Flexion relaxation response | 0.00 ± 0.00 2,3,4 | 0.04 ± 0.05 3,4 | 0.48 ± 0.50 1,2 | 0.72 ± 0.55 1,2 | Yes |
 Duration of trunk flexion (sec) | 2.31 ± 0.63 2,3,4 | 3.11 ± 1.11 1 | 2.87 ± 0.70 1 | 4.10 ± 1.83 1 | Yes |
 Pelvic time-lag at start of movement (sec)c | + 0.17 ± 0.14 2,4 | + 0.42 ± 0.31 1,3 | + 0.13 ± 0.24 2,4 | + 1.10 ± 1.34 1,3 | Yes |
 Pelvic time-lag at 20o of movement (sec)c | + 0.22 ± 0.30 2,4 | + 0.86 ± 0.53 1,4 | - 0.55 ± 0.8 4 | + 2.04 ± 1.74 1,2,3 | Yes |