Skip to main content

Table 3 Type of wave characteristics, source of stimulation energy, and application parameters

From: Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee tendinopathies and other soft tissue disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study author (year) [reference]

Energy generator

Source of energy

Device

Manufacturer

Shock wave treatment protocol

Application parameters (per session)

Total treatment sessions

Interval between sessions

Treatment duration (week)

Rate (Hz)

EFD (mJ/mm2)

No. of impulses

TEDa (mJ/mm2)

Local anesthesia

Chen (2014) [51]

Focused

Piezoelectric

Piezowave

Wolf, Germany

1–8

0.03–0.40

2000

60–800

Not used

6

1 week

6

Geng (2017) [90]

Radial

Pneumatic

LGT2500

Longest, China

NR

0.28

2000

560

Not used

4

1 week

4

Guan (2015) [80]

Radial

Pneumatic

DolorClast

EMS, Switzerland

5–7

0.05–0.075

2000–3000

100–225

Not used

3–5

1 week

3–5

Huang (2017) [88]

Radial

Pneumatic

NR

Xiangyu, China

12

0.18–0.31

2000

360–620

NR

5

1 week

5

Jiang (2016) [81]

Radial

NR

NR

NR

2–4

0.10–0.18

2500

100–625

Not used

6

2 days

2

Khosrawi (2017) [48]

Focused

NR

NR

NR

4

0.15

1500

225

Not used

3

1 week

3

Liu (2016) [82]

Radial

Pneumatic

DolorClast

EMS, Switzerland

10

0.21

2000

420

Not used

4

1 week

4

Taunton (2003) [83]

Focused

Electromagnetic

Sonocur

Siemens, USA

NR

0.17

2000

340

Not used

3–5

1 week

3–5

Thijs (2017) [84]

Focused

Piezoelectric

PiezoClast

EMS, Switzerland

1–2

0.20

1000

200

Not used

3

1 week

3

Vetrano (2013) [85]

Focused

Electromagnetic

Modulith SLK

Storz, Switzerland

NR

0.17–0.25

2400

408–600

Not used

3

2–3 days

2

Wang (2014) [86]

Focused

Electrohydraulic

OssaTron

HMT, Switzerland

NR

0.298

1500

447

Used

1

 

1

Weckström (2016) [52]

Radial

Pneumatic

Masterpuls MP 100

Storz, Switzerland

15

0.10–0.40

4600

460–1840

Not used

3

1 week

3

Wu (2009) [91]

Radial

Pneumatic

ESWO-AJ

EMS, Switzerland

1–15

0.10–0.12

2000

200–240

Not used

36

2 days

12

Wu (2016) [89]

Radial

Pneumatic

MP50

Storz, Switzerland

5–11

0.15–0.32

2000

300–640

Not used

4

5 days

3

Yang (2007) [16]

Focused

Electrohydraulic

HK.ESWO-AJ II

Wikkon, China

1

0.06–0.11

1000–2000

60–220

Not used

6

4 days

3–4

Zhang (2016) [92]

Radial

Pneumatic

MP100

Storz, Switzerland

10–15

0.08–0.15

2000–3000

300–640

Not used

18

2 days

6

Zhang (2017) [17]

Radial

Pneumatic

HK.ESWO-AJ II

Wikkon, China

8

0.11

1800–2000

60–220

Not used

8

3 days

4

Zhou (2015) [53]

Radial

Pneumatic

DolorClast

EMS, Switzerland

8–10

0.10–0.18

2000

200–360

Not used

5

4 days

3

Zwerver (2011) [87]

Focused

Piezoelectric

Piezowave

Wolf, Germany

4

0.10–0.58

2000

200–1160

Not used

3

1 week

3

  1. aTED = EFD × number of shock wave impulses
  2. EMS Electro Medical Systems, HMT High Medical Technology, DMT Dornier MedTech, EFD energy flux density, TED total energy dose (intensity × number of shock wave impulses), NR not reported