Skip to main content

Table 1 Manual correction’s thoracic Cobb angle simulation results compared to reference standing posture and associated stiffness indices

From: Global postural re-education in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical modeling and analysis of curve reduction during active and assisted self-correction

Patient

Presenting deformity (standing posture)

Simulation of manual correction (% reduction)

Mean force applied by therapist over thoracic apex

Manual correction’s stiffness index

 

deg

deg (%)

N

N / deg

P1

45

42 (7)

31

10

P2

25

21 (14)

33

10

P3

40

27 (31)

31

3

P4

33

25 (23)

28

4

P5

36

32 (13)

28

6

P6

23

16 (31)

23

3

P7

42

35 (17)

25

4

P8

36

27 (26)

25

3

P9

39

37 (7)

26

10

P10

28

10 (64)

55

3

P11

25

13 (48)

29

2

P12

37

31 (18)

33

5

P13

45

26 (43)

42

2

P14

11

5 (53)

31

5

P15

30

26 (13)

34

9

P16

31

27 (13)

28

7

Mean ± sd [min - max]

33 ± 9 [11–45]

25 ± 10 [5–42]

31 ± 8 [23–55]

5 ± 3 [2–10]