Skip to main content

Table 3 Cumulative exposure assignments among men for the single exposure categories

From: Dose-response relationship between cumulative physical workload and osteoarthritis of the hip – a meta-analysis applying an external reference population for exposure assignment

Study, country

Median age (ref. population: 47.3 years, range 25–70 yrs.)

Exposure parameter of the included study (not used for analysis)

Cases, n

Control subjects/Participantsa, n (%)

Median exposure percentile

OR (95% CI)

Assigned exposure parameter ab [tons]

Assigned exposure parameter bc [tons]

Assigned exposure parameter cd [numbers × 1000]

Assigned age-correctedeexposure a. [tons]

Assigned age-correctedeexposure b. [tons]

Assigned age-correctedeexposure c. [numbers × 1000]

Coggon et al. [3], GB

mean 68 years (≥ 45 years)f

Duration of lifting loads ≥25 kg

210 (total)

210 (total)

        
  

0 years

91

115 (54.8%)

27.4

1.0 -

0

0

0

0

0

0

  

1–9 years

22

28 (13.3%)

61.5

0.8 (0.4–1.7)

353

194

12

615

246

15

  

10–19 years

14

15 (7,1%)

71.7

1.5 (0.6–3.8)

1299

968

41

1331

1054

46

  

≥ 20 years

83

52 (24.8%)

87.6

2.3 (1.3–4.4)

4632

4354

170

5505

5168

191

Croft et al. [5, 6], GB

range 60–75 years

Duration of lifting or moving weights > 25.4 kg by hand

49 (total)

262g (total)

        
  

< 1 years

9

71 (27.1%)

13.6

1.0 -

0

0

0

0

0

0

  

1–19 years

14

106 (40.5%)

47.4

1.2 (0.5–2.9)

8

0

0.6

8

0

0.3

  

≥ 20 years

26

85 (32.4%)

83.8

2.5 (1.1–5.7)

3380

3252

107

4449

3818

124

Elsner et al. [7], Germany

ca. 51 years (43% ≤45 yrs.)

Lifting > 20 kg frequently or almost always

134 (total)

95 (total)

        
  

No

73

61 (64.2%)

32.1

1.0 -

0

0

0

0

0

0

  

Yes

61

34 (35.8%)

82.1

1.1 (0.65–2.10)

3061

2670

88

3061

2670

88

Kaila-Kangas et al. [10], Finland

ca. 51 years (range 30–97 years)

Duration of manual handling of loads > 20 kg

59 (total)

2,853h (total)

        
  

0 years

19

1,561i (53.6%)

26.8

1.0 -

0

0

0

0

0

0

  

1–12 years

7

468i (16.1%)

61.7

1.1 (0.4–3.2)

353

194

12

353

194

12

  

13–24 years

10

371i (12.7%)

76.1

2.2 (0.8–5.9)

1725

1428

65

1725

1428

65

  

>  24 years

23

514i (17.6%)

91.2

2.3 (1.2–4.3)

6687

6432

278

6687

6432

278

Lau et al. [12], Hong Kong

Not reported

Lifting ≥50 kg

30 (total)

90 (total)

        
  

No

17

80 (88.9%)

44.5

1.0 -

0

0

0.6

0

0

0

  

1–10 times per week

5

4 (4.4%)

91.1

8.5 (1.6–45.3)

6687

6432

278

10,866

9076

336

  

≥10 times per week

8

6 (6.7%)

96.7

9.6 (2.2–42.2)

21,837

21,823

607

24,695

24,278

727

Rubak et al. [17], Denmark

64.3 years (range ca. 40–70 yrs.)

No. of ton years (1 ton year = lifting 1 ton per day over 1 year)

957 (total)

1759 (total)

        
  

0 ton years

390

779

22.2

1.0 -

0

0

0

0

0

0

  

> 0- < 10 ton years

164

333

53.8

1.0 (0.8–1.3)

92

0

26

116

0

5

  

10- < 20 ton years

153

304

71.9

0.9 (0.7–1.2)

1299

968

41

1331

1054

46

  

20–115 ton years

250

343

90.3

1.4 (1.1–1.7)

6527

5980

219

8946

6668

325

Vingard et al. [26], Sweden

63 years (range 50–70 yrs.)

Lifted tons before the age of 49

233 (total)

302 (total)

        
  

0–137 tons

 

60%j

30.0

1.0 -

0

0

0

0

0

0

  

138–3006 tons

 

20%j

70.0

1.6 (0.9–2.7)

1054

784

34

1226

968

41

  

3007–94,003 tons

 

20%j

90.0

1.8 (1.1–3.0)

6101

5971

218

7177

6596

280

  1. aIn the study of Kaila-Kangas et al. [10], the distribution of participants is given
  2. bCumulative weight [in tons] lifted and/or carried, taking into account all weights ≥20 kg
  3. cCumulative weight [in tons] lifted and/or carried, taking into account all weights ≥20 kg that were handled at least 10 times per working day
  4. dCumulative number of lifting and/or carrying operations of weights ≥20 kg
  5. eFor studies with a mean age > 60, the reference population is restricted to individuals ≥50 years
  6. fAccording to Cooper et al. [4]
  7. gExcluding 32 control subjects with missing values
  8. hExcluding 257 participants with missing values
  9. iKaila-Kangas L. Personal communication. Email dated April 3, 2017
  10. jVingard et al. [26] do not give the numbers of cases and control subjects in the single exposure categories. Exposure categories were formed as follows: “Three exposure groups were defined on the basis of the loads in the reference group. Those unexposed and the 5% less exposed were considered to have low exposure. The rest of the exposed group was divided into two equally large groups, classified as the medium-exposure group and the high-exposure group” ([26], p. 106). In the Vingard et al. [26] study, the reference category includes all individuals with an exposure of up to 137 tons. In our reference population, a 137 ton-exposure corresponds to the 60th exposure percentile. We therefore assigned the 30th mean exposure percentile to the reference category