Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of previous studies

From: Risk factors for failure of revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device

Authors

Device type

Cases

Bone defect classification

Mean f/u years

Survival rate (loosening endpoint)

Ilyas et al. [5]

Burch-Schneider cage

33

AAOS III, IV

6.2y

85%

Schlegel et al. [6]

Mueller reinforcement ring

164

AAOS I-IV

8y

95%

Kerboull et al. [8]

Kerboull reinforcement device

53

AAOS III-IV

13y

92.1%

Kawanabe et al. [9]

Kerboull reinforcement device

42

AAOS II-IV

8.7y

67%

Baba et al. [10]

KT-plate

18

AAOS II, III

5y

87.5%

Hori et al. [11]

KT-plate

32

AAOS III, IV

10y

82.1%