Skip to main content

Table 4 An overview of the prognostic capacity of the new subgroupings compared to that of the comparator prognostic variables

From: Latent class analysis derived subgroups of low back pain patients – do they have prognostic capacity?

Outcome measure

Description of prognostic variable

Prognostic variable

Single-stage and two-stage subgroupings

Table 3 (absolute outcomes)

Table 5 (in addition to baseline values)

Table 6 (in addition to recovery belief)

Table 7 (in addition to recovery belief and baseline values)

Pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0–10)

Existing subgrouping tools

STarT Back Tool

Highera

Higher

Higher

Higher

Quebec Task Force classification

Higher

Higher

Similar at 3 m, higher at 2 w and 12 m

Similar at 3 m, higher at 2 w and 12 m

Baseline characteristics

Baseline back pain intensity (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale)

Higher

N/A

Higher

N/A

Baseline leg pain intensity (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale)

Higher

Similar at 2 w and 12 m, higher at 3 m

Similar at 2 w and 12 m, higher at 3 m

Lower at 2 w and 12 m, higher at 3 m

Baseline disability (RMDQ-23), (0–100 = highest disability)

Higher

Higher

Higher

Higher

Recovery belief (0–10 = very likely)

Similar at 2 w and 12 m, lower at 3 m

Similar at 2 w and 12 m, lower at 3 m

N/A

N/A

Results of first stage of two-stage LCA

All domain-specific patient categorisations

Lowerb

Lower

Lower

Lower

Disability (23-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, proportional score)

Existing subgrouping tools

STarT Back Tool

Higher

Higher

Higher

Higher

Quebec Task Force classification

Higher

Higher

Higher

Similar 12 m, higher at 2 w and 3 m

Baseline characteristics

Baseline back pain intensity (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale)

Higher

Higher

Higher

Higher

Baseline leg pain intensity (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale)

Higher

Higher

Similar at 12 m, higher at 2 w and 3 m

Lower at 12 m, higher at 2 w and 3 m

Baseline disability (RMDQ-23), (0–100 = highest disability)

Similar at 2 w, higher at 3 m and 12 m

N/A

Lower at 2 w, similar at 12 m, higher at 3 m

N/A

Recovery belief (0–10 = very likely)

Similar at 3 m, lower at 12 m, higher at 2 w

Lower 3 m and 12 m, higher at 2 w

N/A

N/A

Results of first stage of two-stage LCA

All domain-specific patient categorisations

Lower

Lower

Lower

Lower

  1. m months, w weeks, N/A not applicable as the variables were taking into account in the regression model and were therefore not the variable of interest
  2. aHigher: if the subgroupings had a higher prognostic capacity than that of the prognostic variable at all three time points, when it was not it is stated
  3. bLower: if the subgroupings had a lower prognostic capacity than that of the prognostic variable at all three time points