Table 2 The results of the static posturography of the experimental group and the control group in normal standing, tandem, one leg standing, with open (EO) and closed eyes (EC). No significant differences were found
From: Does structural leg-length discrepancy affect postural control? Preliminary study
Variable | Normal standing EO | Normal standing EC | Tandem, the shorter limb in the front position EO | Tandem, the shorter limb in the front position EC | Tandem, the shorter limb in the rear position EO | Tandem, the shorter limb in the rear position EC | One leg standing on the shorter limb | One leg standing on the longer limb | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group Aa | Group Bb | Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | |
Mean COP sway velocity [mm/s] ML (SD) | 9.5 (6.4) | 4.6 (5.0) | 18.5 (21.6) | 5.8 (7.8) | 16.9 (11.7) | 13.6 (7.5) | 32.3 (13.1) | 29.0 (18.6) | 19.1 (12.8) | 13.6 (7.5) | 41.9 (25.3) | 29.0 (18.6) | 45.4 (35.8) | 23.5 (11.1) | 27.5 (20.9) | 23.5 (11.1) |
Mean COP sway velocity [mm/s] AP (SD) | 12.1 (9.1) | 6.3 (5.7) | 19.1 (11.8) | 8.6 (7.1) | 22.1 (20.1) | 16.1 (12.9) | 32.2 (18.7) | 28.9 (34.6) | 31.6 (38.5) | 16.1 (12.9) | 47.1 (29.0) | 28.9 (34.6) | 48.5 (39.5) | 22.5 (18.0) | 28.3 (24.7) | 22.5 (18.0) |