Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Evaluating non-responders of a survey in the Swedish fracture register: no indication of different functional result

Original Submission
31 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Gordon
15 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lise Hestbaek
16 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thorsten Tjardes
28 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hans Juto
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hans Juto
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lise Hestbaek
9 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Gordon
20 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hans Juto
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Gordon
25 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lise Hestbaek
16 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hans Juto
Resubmission - Version 5
16 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1634-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page