Table 7 Literature overview on distal femoral replacement after tumor surgery
Study | No. of implants | Mean follow-up (months) | Postoperative Functional Assessment | Implant survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Back et al. [26] | 32 | 58 | KSS: 95 | 84% |
Barrack et al. [27] | 16 | 51 | KSS: 131 | 94% |
Barrack et al. [28] | 23 | 58 | KSS: 133 | 96% |
Berend et al. [29] | 39 | 46 | KSS: 123 | 87% |
Jones et al. [30] | 16 | 47 | KSS: 137 | 96% |
Jones et al. [31] | 30 | 49 | KSS: 134 | 88% |
Lombardi et al. [32] | 113 | 25 | HSS: 73 | 85% |
Petrou et al. [33] | 100 | 132 | KSS: 163 | 87% |
Pour et al. [34] | 44 | 50 | KSS 117 | 70% |
Pradham et al. [35] | 51 | 48 | HSS: 72 | N/A |
Rand et al. [36] | 38 | 50 | N/A | 48% |
Springer et al. [37] | 69 | 75 | KSS : 100 | 67% |
Springer et al. [38] | 26 | 59 | KSS: 101 | 73% |
Utting and Newman [39] | 30 | 36 | KSS: 106 | 70% |
Westrich et al. [40] | 24 | 33 | KSS: 128 | 92% |