Peer Review reports
From: Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Jul 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Bruno |
| 30 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chad Cook |
| 12 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marcia Miller-Spoto |
| 11 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Tom Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Bruno |
| 23 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chad Cook |
| 29 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marcia Miller-Spoto |
| 20 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Tom Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Apr 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bing Lu |
| 2 May 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Tom Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 May 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 May 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 May 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.