Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of Secondary Endpoints during Part II

From: A randomized, clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of two doses of etoricoxib versus naproxen in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

 

Naproxen 1000 mg (Part I)/1000 mg (Part II)

Etoricoxib 60 mg (Part I)/60 mg (Part II)

Etoricoxib 60 mg (Part I)/90 mg (Part II)

LS mean difference between etoricoxib 60 mg/90 mg vs. Etoricoxib 60 mg/60 mg; p-Value

Etoricoxib 90 mg (Part I/90 mg (Part II)

Number of Subjects

n = 74

n = 175

n = 178

 

n = 70

LS Mean Change from Week 6 in Spinal Pain Intensity Over Weeks 10 and 12 (95 % CI) (Inadequate Responders in Part I)

−12.89 (−16.57, −9.20)

−7.26 (−9.73, −4.80)

−9.97 (−12.42, −7.51)

−2.70 (−4.88, −0.52)

−7.69 (−11.48, −3.90)

LS Mean Change from Week 6 in PGART Over Weeks 10 and 12 (95 % CI) (Inadequate Responders in Part I)

0.21 (0.07, 0.35)

0.13 (0.04, 0.23)

0.21 (0.12, 0.30)

0.08 (−0.05, 0.21)

0.28 (0.13, 0.42)

Number of Subjects

n = 141

n = 310

n = 314

 

n = 140

Time-weighted LS Mean Change from Baseline in Spinal Pain Intensity Over 26 Weeks (95 % CI)

−38.26 (−41.70, −34.83)

−35.07 (−37.41, −32.73)

−36.30 (−38.65, −33.96)

−1.70 (−5.79, 2.39)

−36.76 (−40.22, −33.31)

  1. LS least squares, CI confidence interval, PGART patient global assessment of response to therapy