Fig. 3From: Biomechanical analysis of different osteosyntheses and the combination with bone substitute in tibial head depression fracturesDisplacement under cyclic loading. The osteosyntheses (Group 1–3) alone revealed a significantly higher displacement compared to the control group with bone substitute (ChronOS™ inject, group 7) alone (Group 1, 7 [p < 0.01]; group 2, 7 [p = 0.04]; group 3, 7 [p < 0.01]). An asterisk indicates a significant between-group difference (p < 0.05)Back to article page