Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the reviewed literature for the specific operative techniques

From: Surgical treatment for achilles tendinopathy – a systematic review

 

Year

CMS

N

Age

FU

SR

PS

CR

Open peritendineous debridement

Nelen et al. [24]a

1989

66

93

n.s.

n.s.

88

n.s.

n.s.

Paavola et al. [18]

2002

59

16

37

7

100

94

6

  

62.5 ± 4.9

109

37

7

89.8 ± 8.5

94

6

Open intratendineous debridement

Nelen et al. [24]a

1989

66

26

n.s.

n.s.

73

n.s.

n.s.

Alfredson et al. [19]

2007

53

10

45

6

100

80

10

Lohrer & Nauck [32]

2014

81

34

50

12

97

n.s.

8

Paavola et al. [18]

2002

59

26

46

7

73

79

27

  

64.8 ± 12.1

96

47.8 ± 2.6

6.8 ± 4.9

84.3 ± 14.8

79.3 ± 0.7

15.3 ± 10.4

FHL transfer/augmentation

Nelen et al. [24]

1989

66

24

n.s.

n.s.

87

n.s.

n.s.

Cottom et al. [29]

2008

81

62

61

27

n.s.

95

23

Wilcox et al. [41]

2000

58

17

61

14

75

n.s.

0

Martin et al. [37]

2005

84

44

58

41

91

86

11

Lui et al. [33]

2012

69

5

46

20

80

n.s.

0

  

71.6 ± 10.8

152

59.4 ± 7.1

29.8 ± 11.6

86.3 ± 7.1

91.3 ± 6.4

14.9 ± 11.0

Gastrocnemius recession

Duthon et al. [30]

2011

64

14

42

24

79

60

0

Gurdezi et al. [31]

2013

70

5

45

30

n.s.

66

n.s.

  

67.0 ± 4.2

19

42.8 ± 2.1

25.6 ± 4.2

79.0

61.6 ± 4.2

0.0

Percutaneous longitudinal tenotomy

Alfredson et al. [25]

2011

73

87

46

18

83

83

3

Maffulli et al. [28]

2013

84

39

45

204

77

77

18

  

78.5 ± 7.8

126

45.7 ± 0.7

75.6 ± 131.6

81.1 ± 4.2

81.1 ± 4.2

7.6 ± 10.6

Minimally invasive paratenon debridement

Maquirriain et al. [42]

2013

79

24

46

92

100

n.s.

7

Pearce et al. [26]

2012

62

11

37

30

n.s.

72

0

Vega et al. [40]

2008

69

8

43

27

100

n.s.

0

Alfredson et al. [25]

2011

73

16

47

18

74

74

3

Ruergård & Alfredson [38]

2014

79

47

52

12

n.s.

88

0

  

72.4 ± 7.2

106

47.7 ± 5.5

34.0 ± 32.2.

91.3 ± 15.0

82.6 ± 8.7

2.0 ± 3.1

  1. Year of publication (Year), Coleman Methodological Score (CMS), Number of patients (N), aFor this study N means number of tendons, Age (years), Followup period (FU) in months, Success rate (SR) in %, Patient satisfaction (PS) in %, and Complication rates (CR) in %. Values for FU, SR, and PS of the individual studies are presented as means. Summarized information of the specific operative techniques are presented in the last lines of the respective sections (CMS = unweighted mean. Age, FU, SR, PS, and CR = weighted means ± SD)