Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies considered for inclusion

From: Efficacy of physical therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis

Article

Author

Year

Reported outcomes

Treatment duration

Times of measurements

Symptom duration

Treatment

[11]

Basford et al.

2000

apain in last 24 h maximal tenderness on palpation

3S/W for 4 Ws

2 Ws, 4 Ws, follow-up

1–17 Ms

LLLT vs placebo

   

amaximum grip strength pinch strength

    
   

apain with grasp pain with pinch

    

[12]

Bisset et al.

2009

reaction time

8S over 6 Ws

6, 52 Ws

6–89 Ms

Physical therapy vs WLC

[13]

Haake et al.

2002

side effects

1S/W over? Ws

?

1–99 Ms

ECSWT vs placebo

[7]

Ho et al.

2007

mechanical pain threshold

10S over 3 Ws

1, 2, 3 Ws, follow-up 3 Ws

3–15 Ms

Microcurrent & exercise vs exercise

   

bpain-free handgrip strength

    
   

bmaximum handgrip strength pain during max grip

    

[14]

Lam et al.

2007

mechanical pain threshold

3S/W for 3 Ws

Session 5, 9 & 3 Ws after completion

1–9 Ms

LLLT vs placebo

   

amaximum grip strength

    
   

apain after grip strength test

    
   

Disability score

    
   

DASH (sports/music)

    
   

DASH (work)

    

[9]

Martinez-Silvestrini et al.

2005

pain free grip strength

Daily for 6 Ws

6 Ws

3+ Ms

Stretching vs stretching & concentric vs stretching & eccentric strengthening

   

bVAS pain

    
   

PRFEQ

    
   

bdash function

    

[15]

Nourbakhsh et al.

2008

cmaximum grip strength

6S over 2–3 Ws

Post treatment, follow-up

6–60 Ms

Low frequency electrical stimulation vs placebo

   

apain intensity last 24 h functional level (adapted patient specific function scale) limited activity due to pain

    

[10]

Peterson et al.

2011

pain MVC

1S/D exercise regimen over 3 Ms

1, 2, 3 Ms

3+ Ms

Exercise vs WLC

   

pain MME

    
   

bmuscular strength activity score well-being complaint score

    

[16]

Pettrone et al.

2005

apain during Thomsen test function activity score overall impression

1S/W over 3 Ws

1, 4, 8, 12 Ws; 6, 12 Ms only reported at 12 Ws

6+ Ms

ECSWT vs placebo

   

agrip strength adverse events

    

[17]

Rompe et al.

1996

night pain

1S/W over 3 Ws

3, 6, 24 Ws after last application

12+ Ms

ECSWT vs sham

   

resting pain

    
   

pressure pain

    
   

Thomsen test

    
   

finger extension

    
   

chair test

    
   

cgrip strength (Mucha and Wannske)

    

[18]

Rompe et al.

2001

pressure pain

1S/W over 3 Ws

12 Ws, 12 Ms

12–208 Ms

ECSWT vs ECSWT + manual therapy

   

Thomsen test resisted finger extension chair test

    

[19]

Rompe et al.

2004

apain during Thomsen test

1S/W over 3 Ws

3, 12 Ms

12+ Ms

ECSWT vs sham

   

Roles and Maudsley score upper extremity function scale

    
   

bdynanometer test

    

[20]

Speed et al.

2002

aPain (day and night) night pain 50 % improvement from baseline

1S/M for 3 Ms

1; 2; 3 Ms

3–42 Ms

ECSWT vs placebo

[21]

Staples et al.

2008

aoverall pain index function index (0–100 VAS) pain-free function index dash function (0–100) dash sport (0–100) dash work (0–100) pain free grip ratio

1S/W over 3 Ws

6 Ws; 3, 6 Ms

6–520 Ws

ECSWT vs sham

   

bmax grip strength SF-36 role limitation physical bodily pain general health vitality social function role limitation emotional mental health

    

health transition problem elicitation technique PET global health

[22]

Sterigioulas et al.

2007

pain at rest

2S/W over first 4 Ws 1S/W over second 4 Ws

8 Ws, 8 Ws after end of treatment

5 Ws-12 Ys

LLLT & exercise vs placebo and exercise

   

pain at palpation

    
   

apain on isometric testing pain during middle finger test

    
   

apain during grip strength test

    

[47]

Öken et al.

2008

Grip strength

5S/W over two weeks

2 Ws, 4 Ws after end of treatment

1–24 Ms

Ultrasound & hot pack vs LLLT & hot pack vs brace control group

   

Pain severety

    
   

Global assessment of improvement

    

[23]

Uzunca et al.

2007

resting pain

5S/W over 3 Ws

3 Ws, 3 Ms

1–11 Ms

Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) vs sham PEMF

   

aactivity pain

    
   

night pain

    
   

pain during resisted wrist

    
   

dorsiflexion pain during resisted forearm supination algometric pain threshold

    
  1. W week, M month, S Session
  2. aOutcome used in meta-analysis
  3. bNot included due to control group design
  4. cNot included since the authors could not assuredly establish a method to transform data into kg