Skip to main content

Table 2 Etiopathological factors in order of decreasing frequency

From: Work related etiology of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis: a case-control study with prospectively collected data

Variables

Cases n ( %)

Controls n ( %)

OR (95 % CI)k

p - value

Professional groups

n = 58e

n = 52e

 

0.43a

semi-skilled worker

21/58 (36)

12/52 (23)

  

training occupation

22/58 (38)

27/52 (52)

  

technical occupation

6/58 (10)

5/52 (10)

  

academic profession

9/58 (16)

8/52 (15)

  

Occupational group

n = 77d

n = 65d

 

0.23a

manual labor

14/77 (18)

17/65 (26)

  

administrative work

34/77 (44)

20/65 (31)

  

neither manual labor nor administrative work

29/77 (38)

28/65 (43)

  

Occupational hierarchy according to Goldthorp

n = 58e

n = 52e

  

I

13/58 (22)

9/52 (17)

I – IV vs. V – VII

0.95a

0.7 (0.3 – 1.6)

II

13/58 (22)

11/52 (21)

  

III

9/58 (16)

7/52 (13)

  

IV

6/58 (10)

4/52 (8)

  

V

5/58 (9)

6/52 (12)

  

VI

6/58 (10)

7/52 (13)

  

VII

6/58 (10)

8/52 (15)

  

Working time

n = 58e

n = 52e

  

average working hours per week, in hours (range)

34 (7–60)

38 (10–55)

 

0.05c

Piecework

n = 58f

n = 52f

  

daily

4/58 (7)

3/52 (6)

Yes vs. never

0.76b

1.6 (0.5 – 5.5)

3/4 of the time

1/58 (2)

-

  

1/2 of the time

1/58 (2)

3/52 (6)

  

1/4 of the time

2/58 (3)

1/52 (2)

  

never

50/58 (86)

45/52 (87)

  

Work with computer

n = 58f

n = 47f

  

daily

17/58 (29)

15/47 (32)

Yes vs. never

0.99b

1.5 (0.6 – 3.7)

3/4 of the time

2/58 (3)

2/47 (4)

  

1/2 of the time

4/58 (7)

2/47 (4)

  

1/4 of the time

12/58 (21)

9/47 (19)

  

never

23/58 (40)

19/47 (40)

  

Twisting motions at work

n = 58f

n = 52f

  

every hour

11/58 (19)

11/52 (21)

Every hour/daily vs. 2–3× per week/

0.31b

1× per week/never

1.2 (0.6 – 2.8)

daily

14/58 (24)

15/52 (29)

  

2–3× per week

5/58 (9)

-

  

1× per week

4/58 (7)

3/52 (6)

  

never

24/58 (41)

23/52 (44)

  

Powerful motions of the forearm or hand

n = 58f

n = 47f

  

every hour

14/58 (24)

8/47 (17)

Every hour/daily vs. 2–3× per week/

0.06b

1× per week/never

1.0 (0.4 – 2.3)

daily

10/58 (17)

15/47 (32)

  

2–3× per week

4/58 (7)

2/47 (4)

  

1× per week

2/58 (3)

7/47 (15)

  

never

28/58 (48)

15/47 (32)

  

Pulling or pushing of loads

n = 58f

n = 47f

  

every hour

3/58 (5)

5/47 (11)

Every hour/daily vs. 2–3× per week/

0.04b

1× per week/never

0.6 (0.3 – 1.5)

daily

8/58 (14)

12/47 (26)

  

2–3× per week

3/58 (5)

-

  

1× per week

11/58 (19)

2/47 (4)

  

never

33/58 (57)

28/47 (60)

  

Ergonomically stressful work

n = 58f

n = 52f

  

every hour

7/58 (12)

9/52 (17)

Every hour/daily vs. 2–3× per week/

0.42a

1× per week/never

0.7 (0.3 – 1.5)

daily

10/58 (17)

15/52 (29)

  

2–3× per week

4/58 (7)

3/52 (6)

  

1× per week

6/58 (10)

6/52 (12)

  

never

31/58 (53)

19/52 (37)

  

Musical instrument

n = 77h

n = 65h

  

current

4/77 (5)

7/65 (11)

0.6 (0.1–2.3)

0.35b

former & never

73/77 (95)

58/65 (89)

  

High impact sports i

n = 77h

n = 65h

  

current

39/77 (51)

23/65 (35)

1.8 (0.9–3.7)

0.06b

former & never

38/77 (49)

42/65 (65)

  

Rheumatoid arthritis

    

suspicion of rheumatoid arthritis j

0/77 (0)

1/65 (2)

-

0.46b

morning stiffness > 1 h

4/77 (5)

14/65 (20)

0.8 (0.1–5.1)

0.01b

arthritis of 3 or more joint areas

3/77 (4)

7/65 (11)

0.4 (0.1–1.6)

0.2b

symmetric arthritis

0/77 (0)

3/65 (4)

-

0.1b

Trauma (<2 years before dQ)

2/77 (3)

0/65 (0)

-

0.5b

Working time at computer

n = 28h

n = 30h

  

Computer use in hours per week

19 (1–40)

16 (1–54)

 

0.24c

Keyboard

n = 28h

n = 30h

  

ergonomic

2/28 (7)

1/30 (3)

Laptop vs. PC (normal/ergonomic)

0.88b

0.9 (0.2 – 6.6)

normal

23/28 (82)

25/30 (83)

  

Laptop

3/28 (11)

4/30 (13)

  

Mouse

n = 28h

n = 30h

  

normal

24/28 (86)

26/30 (87)

Touchpad vs. PC-mouse (normal/ergonomic)

0.87b

0.9 (0.1 – 6.4)

ergonomic

2/28 (7)

1/30 (3)

  

Touchpad

2/28 (7)

3/30 (10)

  
  1. Two patients with dQ and four controls who changed their job after diagnosis were not taken into account in the characterization of professional activity. The professional training of all patients was evaluated, regardless of whether they were working at the time of the diagnosis or not
  2. aChi2-Tests
  3. bFisher’s exact test
  4. cMann-Whitney u test
  5. dTotal number of patients in whom the item is applicable
  6. eTotal number of patients working at the time of diagnosis
  7. fTotal number of patients in whom the professional activity includes this kind of work
  8. gNumber of patients, which are doing or have done this kind of activity
  9. hRestricted to sports that require repetitive and strenuous forearm and wrist movements
  10. i Patients with at least 3 of the symptoms below
  11. jAdjusted for age (≤50 vs. >50) and gender